Cited by 31Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum many-body systems

Collective Uncertainty Entanglement Test

Open access
Rudnicki, Łukasz, Horodecki, Paweł, Życzkowski, Karol·2011·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

For a given pure state of a composite quantum system we analyze the product of its projections onto a set of locally orthogonal separable pure states. We derive a bound for this product analogous to the entropic uncertainty relations. For bipartite systems the bound is saturated for maximally entangled states and it allows us to construct a family of entanglement measures, we shall call collectibility. As these quantities are experimentally accessible, the approach advocated contributes to the task of experimental quantification of quantum entanglement, while for a three-qubit system it is capable to identify the genuine three-party entanglement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.107.150502

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The setup applied in this work was also used earlier in Refs.48-51 for conceptually different tasks.

    “We note that the setup applied in this work was also used earlier in Refs.48–51, but for conceptually different tasks, e.g., measuring collective nonlinear witnesses of entanglement52,53, Bell nonlocality measure54, or diagnosing an entanglement-swapping protocol.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 31

Authors
Rudnicki, Ł., Horodecki, P., & Życzkowski, K.
Affiliations
  • Center for Theoretical Physics (PL)
  • Gdańsk University of Technology (PL)
  • Jagiellonian University (PL)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2011-10-03
Volume
107
Issue
15
Pages
150502-150502
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1969343012
Cited by
31
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
entropic uncertainty relations, entanglement measures, maximally entangled states, bipartite entanglement, three-qubit systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review