Cited by 233Topological Materials and PhenomenaQuantum many-body systemsTheoretical and Computational Physics

Quantum Criticality between Topological and Band Insulators in3+1Dimensions

Open access
Goswami, Pallab, Chakravarty, Sudip·2011·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Four-component massive and massless Dirac fermions in the presence of long range Coulomb interaction and chemical potential disorder exhibit striking fermionic quantum criticality. For an odd number of flavors of Dirac fermions, the sign of the Dirac mass distinguishes the topological and the trivial band insulator phases, and the gapless semimetallic phase corresponds to the quantum critical point that separates the two. Up to a critical strength of disorder, the semimetallic phase remains stable, and the universality class of the direct phase transition between two insulating phases is unchanged. Beyond the critical strength of disorder the semimetallic phase undergoes a phase transition into a disorder controlled diffusive metallic phase, and there is no longer a direct phase transition between the two types of insulating phases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.107.196803

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analogous calculations for 3D semimetals show a vanishing density of states persisting up to a finite value of disorder strength (Fradkin, 1986; Goswami and Chakravarty, 2011; Hosur et al., 2012; Pixley et al., 2016a) beyond which a metallic state is expected.

    “Analogous calculations for 3D semimetals show a vanishing density of states persisting up to a finite value of disorder strength (Fradkin, 1986; Goswami and Chakravarty, 2011; Hosur et al. , 2012; Pixley et al. , 2016a) beyond which a metallic state is expected.”

    From Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids (2018) · cites this paper as Goswami and Chakravarty, 2011

  • In Dirac systems, due to particle-hole symmetry there can be current carrying states with zero total momentum.

    “But in Dirac systems, due to particle-hole symmetry there can be current carrying states with zero total momentum (Fritz et al. , 2008; Goswami and Chakravarty, 2011).”

    From Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids (2018) · cites this paper as Goswami and Chakravarty, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goswami, P., & Chakravarty, S.
Affiliations
  • Rice University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2011-11-02
Volume
107
Issue
19
Pages
196803-196803
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2021175989
Cited by
233
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
Keywords
quantum criticality, topological insulators, band insulator, Dirac fermions, long-range Coulomb interaction, quantum critical point, semimetallic phase, critical exponents, universality class, four-dimensional spacetime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review