Support for the Thermal Origin of the Pioneer Anomaly
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the possibility that the anomalous acceleration of the Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft is due to the recoil force associated with an anisotropic emission of thermal radiation off the vehicles. To this end, relying on the project and spacecraft design documentation, we constructed a comprehensive finite-element thermal model of the two spacecraft. Then, we numerically solve thermal conduction and radiation equations using the actual flight telemetry as boundary conditions. We use the results of this model to evaluate the effect of the thermal recoil force on the Pioneer 10 spacecraft at various heliocentric distances. We found that the magnitude, temporal behavior, and direction of the resulting thermal acceleration are all similar to the properties of the observed anomaly. As a novel element of our investigation, we develop a parametrized model for the thermal recoil force and estimate the coefficients of this model independently from navigational Doppler data. We find no statistically significant difference between the two estimates and conclude that, once the thermal recoil force is properly accounted for, no anomalous acceleration remains.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The estimated uncertainty in the acceleration of the Pioneer 10 spacecraft due to thermal emission of its radio isotope thermal electric generator (RTG) is about 2 × 10^-10 m s^-2.
“For example, the estimated uncertainty in the acceleration of the Pioneer 10 spacecraft due to thermal emission of its radio isotope thermal electric generator (RTG) is about 2 × 10 -10 m s -2 [63].”
From Has Kronos Devoured Planet Nine and Its Epigones? (2026) · cites this paper as [63]
Using interplanetary spacecraft acceleration to detect a distant planetary candidate like P9 is unfeasible because uncertainties in non-gravitational accelerations are larger than the P9-induced acceleration.
“Unfortunately, such an ideally appealing possibility should be deemed as unfeasible because of a number of reasons exposed below 9 .”
From Has Kronos Devoured Planet Nine and Its Epigones? (2026) · cites this paper as [63]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996 · see citing works
Testing theories of gravity with planetary ephemerides
Fienga, A., & Minazzoli, O. (2024) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-023-00047-0 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Has Kronos Devoured Planet Nine and Its Epigones?
Iorio, L. (2026) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe12020042
“In this frame the string effective action is also minimally coupled to perfect fluid sources.”
- Authors
- Turyshev, S. G., Toth, V. T., Kinsella, G., Lee, S.-C., Lok, S. M., & Ellis, J.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Applied Sciences Laboratory (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-06-12
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 241101-241101
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2096552091
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 10.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- Pioneer anomaly, Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11, spacecraft thermal modeling, anomalous acceleration, finite element thermal model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review