Cited by 87Topological Materials and PhenomenaNonlinear Photonic SystemsQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics

Optical Analogues for Massless Dirac Particles and Conical Diffraction in One Dimension

Open access
Zeuner, J. M., Efremidis, N. K., Keil, R., Dreisow, F., Christodoulides, D. N., Tünnermann, A., Nolte, S., Szameit, A.·2012·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We demonstrate that light propagating in an appropriately designed lattice can exhibit dynamics akin to that expected from massless relativistic particles as governed by the one-dimensional Dirac equation. This is accomplished by employing a waveguide array with alternating positive and negative effective coupling coefficients, having a band structure with two intersecting minibands. Through this approach optical analogues of massless particle-antiparticle pairs are experimentally realized. One-dimensional conical diffraction is also observed for the first time in this work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.109.023602

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Control over the sign can be acquired by dynamical modulation of the lattice, Raman-assisted tunneling or embedding defects in infinite arrays.

    “Control over this sign can be acquired by dynamical modulation of the lattice [16-21], Raman-assisted tunneling [22, 23] or embedding defects in infinite arrays [24].”

    From Universal Sign Control of Coupling in Tight-Binding Lattices (2016) · cites this paper as [21]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeuner, J. M., Efremidis, N. K., Keil, R., Dreisow, F., Christodoulides, D. N., Tünnermann, A., Nolte, S., & Szameit, A.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
  • University of Crete (GR)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2012-07-13
Volume
109
Issue
2
Pages
023602-023602
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2328717021
Cited by
87
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Nonlinear Photonic Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Keywords
massless Dirac equation, one-dimensional Dirac equation, conical diffraction, waveguide arrays, effective coupling coefficient, particle-antiparticle pairs, photonic lattices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review