The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliable Quantum State Tomography
Open accessAbstract
Quantum state tomography is the task of inferring the state of a quantum system by appropriate measurements. Since the frequency distributions of the outcomes of any finite number of measurements will generally deviate from their asymptotic limits, the estimates computed by standard methods do not in general coincide with the true state and, therefore, have no operational significance unless their accuracy is defined in terms of error bounds. Here we show that quantum state tomography, together with an appropriate data analysis procedure, yields reliable and tight error bounds, specified in terms of confidence regions-a concept originating from classical statistics. Confidence regions are subsets of the state space in which the true state lies with high probability, independently of any prior assumption on the distribution of the possible states. Our method for computing confidence regions can be applied to arbitrary measurements including fully coherent ones; it is practical and particularly well suited for tomography on systems consisting of a small number of qubits, which are currently in the focus of interest in experimental quantum information science.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory
Holevo, A. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-88-7642-378-9 · Cited by 2,582
James, D. F. V., Kwiat, P. G., Munro, W. J., & White, A. G. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052312 · Cited by 2,176
Description of States in Quantum Mechanics by Density Matrix and Operator Techniques
Fano, U. (1957) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.29.74 · Cited by 1,975
Smithey, D. T., Beck, M., Raymer, M. G., & Faridani, A. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1244 · Cited by 1,538
Hradil, Z. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.55.r1561 · Cited by 543
Maximum-likelihood estimation of the density matrix
Banaszek, K., D’Ariano, G. M., Paris, M. G. A., & Sacchi, M. F. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.010304 · Cited by 342
Cited by
The Variational Quantum Eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices
Tilly, J., Chen, H., Cao, S., Picozzi, D., Setia, K., Li, Y., Grant, E., Wossnig, L., Rungger, I., Booth, G. H., et al. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003 · Cited by 1,031
Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: a review
Wendin, G. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa7e1a · Cited by 890
Quantum tomography via compressed sensing: error bounds, sample complexity and efficient estimators
Flammia, S. T., Gross, D., Liu, Y.-K., & Eisert, J. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/9/095022 · Cited by 358
Banaszek, K., Cramer, M., & Gross, D. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/12/125020 · Cited by 105
Miranowicz, A., Bartkiewicz, K., Peřina, J., Koashi, M., Imoto, N., & Nori, F. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.062123 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Christandl, M., & Renner, R.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-09-19
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 120403-120403
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2029147467
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 18.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliable Quantum State Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.109.120403
- The paper
- Christandl, M., & Renner, R. (2012). Reliable Quantum State Tomography. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.109.120403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.