Cited by 220Quantum optics and atomic interactionsLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies

Coherently Driven Molecular Vibrations and Light Modulation

Garmire, E., Pandarese, F., Townes, C. H.·1963·Physical Review Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.11.160

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 3 · Cited by 220

Authors
Garmire, E., Pandarese, F., & Townes, C. H.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1963-08-15
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
160-163
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029756441
Cited by
220
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
16.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Keywords
coherent control, vibrational modes, optical modulation, coherent excitation, vibrational dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review