Cited by 55Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFluid Dynamics and Thin FilmsFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rotating Polygon Instability of a Swirling Free Surface Flow

Open access
Tophøj, L., Mougel, J., Bohr, T., Fabre, D.·2013·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We explain the rotating polygon instability on a swirling fluid surface [G. H. Vatistas, J. Fluid Mech. 217, 241 (1990) and Jansson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 174502 (2006)] in terms of resonant interactions between gravity waves on the outer part of the surface and centrifugal waves on the inner part. Our model is based on potential flow theory, linearized around a potential vortex flow with a free surface for which we show that unstable resonant states appear. Limiting our attention to the lowest order mode of each type of wave and their interaction, we obtain an analytically soluble model, which, together with estimates of the circulation based on angular momentum balance, reproduces the main features of the experimental phase diagram. The generality of our arguments implies that the instability should not be limited to flows with a rotating bottom (implying singular behavior near the corners), and indeed we show that we can obtain the polygons transiently by violently stirring liquid nitrogen in a hot container.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.110.194502

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.174502 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1017/jfm.2011.152 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1017/jfm.2011.492 · DOI
  4. 10.1017/jfm.2013.44 · DOI
  5. 10.1063/1.2359740 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/BF01180220 · DOI
  7. 10.1017/S0022112079000495 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.174503 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1017/S0022112089001138 · DOI
  10. 10.1098/rspa.1986.0068 · DOI
  11. 10.1023/A:1004977928351 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 55

Metadata

Authors
Tophøj, L., Mougel, J., Bohr, T., & Fabre, D.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
  • Institut de Mécanique des Fluides de Toulouse (FR)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2013-05-08
Volume
110
Issue
19
Pages
194502-194502
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1990033069
Cited by
55
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Keywords
free surface flow, swirling flow, resonant wave interaction, gravity waves, potential vortex, linear stability analysis, angular momentum balance, liquid nitrogen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review