The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entanglement Generation is Not Necessary for Optimal Work Extraction
Open accessAbstract
We consider reversible work extraction from identical quantum systems. From an ensemble of individually passive states, work can be produced only via global unitary (and thus entangling) operations. However, we show here that there always exists a method to extract all possible work without creating any entanglement, at the price of generically requiring more operations (i.e., additional time). We then study faster methods to extract work and provide a quantitative relation between the amount of generated multipartite entanglement and extractable work. Our results suggest a general relation between entanglement generation and the power of work extraction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Entanglement in many-body systems
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., & Vedral, V. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.517 · Cited by 3,745
Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits
Hill, S., & Wootters, W. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.5022 · Cited by 2,823
How Small Can Thermal Machines Be? The Smallest Possible Refrigerator
Linden, N., Popescu, S., & Skrzypczyk, P. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.130401 · Cited by 453
Cited by
Vinjanampathy, S., & Anders, J. (2016) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107514.2016.1201896 · Cited by 937
Enhancing the Charging Power of Quantum Batteries
Campaioli, F., Pollock, F. A., Binder, F. C., Céleri, L., Goold, J., Vinjanampathy, S., & Modi, K. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.150601 · Cited by 531
Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries
Binder, F. C., Vinjanampathy, S., Modi, K., & Goold, J. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/7/075015 · Cited by 475
Equivalence of Quantum Heat Machines, and Quantum-Thermodynamic Signatures
Uzdin, R., Levy, A., & Kosloff, R. (2015) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.031044 · Cited by 412
Extractable Work, the Role of Correlations, and Asymptotic Freedom in Quantum Batteries
Andolina, G. M., Keck, M., Mari, A., Campisi, M., Giovannetti, V., & Polini, M. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.047702 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Hovhannisyan, K. V., Perarnau-Llobet, M., Huber, M., & Acín, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-12-09
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 240401-240401
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W1981074469
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Entanglement Generation is Not Necessary for Optimal Work Extraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.111.240401
- The paper
- Hovhannisyan, K. V., Perarnau-Llobet, M., Huber, M., & Acín, A. (2013). Entanglement Generation is Not Necessary for Optimal Work Extraction. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.111.240401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
