Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 421

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Catalog of 174 Binary Black Hole Simulations for Gravitational Wave Astronomy

Open access
Mroué, Abdul H., Scheel, Mark A., Szilágyi, Béla, Pfeiffer, Harald P., Boyle, Michael, Hemberger, Daniel A., Kidder, Lawrence E., Lovelace, Geoffrey, Ossokine, Serguei, Taylor, Nicholas W., Zenginoğlu, Anıl, Buchman, Luisa T., Chu, Tony, Foley, Evan, Giesler, Matthew, Owen, Robert, Teukolsky, Saul A.·2013·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

This Letter presents a publicly available catalog of 174 numerical binary black hole simulations following up to 35 orbits. The catalog includes 91 precessing binaries, mass ratios up to 8∶1, orbital eccentricities from a few percent to 10(-5), black hole spins up to 98% of the theoretical maximum, and radiated energies up to 11.1% of the initial mass. We establish remarkably good agreement with post-Newtonian precession of orbital and spin directions for two new precessing simulations, and we discuss other applications of this catalog. Formidable challenges remain: e.g., precession complicates the connection of numerical and approximate analytical waveforms, and vast regions of the parameter space remain unexplored.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.111.241104

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Mroué, A. H., Scheel, M. A., Szilágyi, B., Pfeiffer, H. P., Boyle, M., Hemberger, D. A., Kidder, L. E., Lovelace, G., Ossokine, S., Taylor, N. W., Zenginoğlu, A., Buchman, L. T., Chu, T., Foley, E., Giesler, M., Owen, R., & Teukolsky, S. A.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2013-12-11
Volume
111
Issue
24
Pages
241104-241104
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1990978371
Cited by
421
References
1
FWCI
15.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.