The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controlling Contagion Processes in Activity Driven Networks
Open accessAbstract
The vast majority of strategies aimed at controlling contagion processes on networks consider the connectivity pattern of the system either quenched or annealed. However, in the real world, many networks are highly dynamical and evolve, in time, concurrently with the contagion process. Here, we derive an analytical framework for the study of control strategies specifically devised for a class of time-varying networks, namely activity-driven networks. We develop a block variable mean-field approach that allows the derivation of the equations describing the coevolution of the contagion process and the network dynamic. We derive the critical immunization threshold and assess the effectiveness of three different control strategies. Finally, we validate the theoretical picture by simulating numerically the spreading process and control strategies in both synthetic networks and a large-scale, real-world, mobile telephone call data set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks
Barrat, A., Barthélemy, M., & Vespignani, A. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791383 · Cited by 2,704
Self-citationActivity driven modeling of time varying networks
Perra, N., Gonçalves, B., Pastor-Satorras, R., & Vespignani, A. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00469 · Cited by 709
Self-citation
Cited by
Epidemic processes in complex networks
Pastor-Satorras, R., Castellano, C., Van Mieghem, P., & Vespignani, A. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.925 · Cited by 3,697
Self-citationStatistical physics of vaccination
Wang, Z., Bauch, C. T., Bhattacharyya, S., d'Onofrio, A., Manfredi, P., Perc, M., Perra, N., Salathé, M., & Zhao, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.006 · Cited by 872
Self-citationModern temporal network theory: a colloquium
Holme, P. (2015) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2015-60657-4 · Cited by 734
Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks
Baumann, F., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Sokolov, I. M., & Starnini, M. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.048301 · Cited by 427
Analytical Computation of the Epidemic Threshold on Temporal Networks
Valdano, E., Ferreri, L., Poletto, C., & Colizza, V. (2015) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.021005 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, S., Perra, N., Karsai, M., & Vespignani, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-03-19
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 118702-118702
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W1935028256
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controlling Contagion Processes in Activity Driven Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.112.118702
- The paper
- Liu, S., Perra, N., Karsai, M., & Vespignani, A. (2014). Controlling Contagion Processes in Activity Driven Networks. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.112.118702
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.