Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum Discord Determines the Interferometric Power of Quantum States

Open access
Girolami, Davide, Souza, Alexandre M., Giovannetti, Vittorio, Tufarelli, Tommaso, Filgueiras, Jefferson G., Sarthour, Roberto S., Soares-Pinto, Diogo O., Oliveira, Ivan S., Adesso, Gerardo·2014·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Quantum metrology exploits quantum mechanical laws to improve the precision in estimating technologically relevant parameters such as phase, frequency, or magnetic fields.Probe states are usually tailored to the particular dynamics whose parameters are being estimated.Here we consider a novel framework where quantum estimation is performed in an interferometric configuration, using bipartite probe states prepared when only the spectrum of the generating Hamiltonian is known.We introduce a figure of merit for the scheme, given by the worst-case precision over all suitable Hamiltonians, and prove that it amounts exactly to a computable measure of discord-type quantum correlations for the input probe.We complement our theoretical results with a metrology experiment, realized in a highly controllable room-temperature nuclear magnetic resonance setup, which provides a proof-of-concept demonstration for the usefulness of discord in sensing applications.Discordant probes are shown to guarantee a nonzero phase sensitivity for all the chosen generating Hamiltonians, while classically correlated probes are unable to accomplish the estimation in a worst-case setting.This work establishes a rigorous and direct operational interpretation for general quantum correlations, shedding light on their potential for quantum technology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.112.210401

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Girolami, D., Souza, A. M., Giovannetti, V., Tufarelli, T., Filgueiras, J. G., Sarthour, R. S., Soares-Pinto, D. O., Oliveira, I. S., & Adesso, G.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2014-05-27
Volume
112
Issue
21
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2087829147
Cited by
277
References
43
FWCI
30.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum Discord Determines the Interferometric Power of Quantum States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.112.210401
The paper
Girolami, D., Souza, A. M., Giovannetti, V., Tufarelli, T., Filgueiras, J. G., Sarthour, R. S., Soares-Pinto, D. O., Oliveira, I. S., & Adesso, G. (2014). Quantum Discord Determines the Interferometric Power of Quantum States. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.112.210401

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.