Cited by 119Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

Constraints on Primordial Non-Gaussianity from 800 000 Photometric Quasars

Open access
Leistedt, Boris, Peiris, Hiranya V., Roth, Nina·2014·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We derive robust constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity (PNG) using the clustering of 800 000 photometric quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey in the redshift range $0.5<z<3.5$. These measurements rely on the novel technique of extended mode projection to control the impact of spatially varying systematics in a robust fashion, making use of blind analysis techniques. This allows the accurate measurement of quasar halo bias at the largest scales, while discarding as little as possible of the data. The standard local-type PNG parameters ${f}_{\mathrm{NL}}$ and ${g}_{\mathrm{NL}}$ both imprint a ${k}^{\ensuremath{-}2}$ scale-dependent effect in the bias. Constraining these individually, we obtain $\ensuremath{-}49<{f}_{\mathrm{NL}}<31$ and $\ensuremath{-}2.7\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1{0}^{5}<{g}_{\mathrm{NL}}<1.9\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1{0}^{5}$, while their joint constraints lead to $\ensuremath{-}105<{f}_{\mathrm{NL}}<72$ and $\ensuremath{-}4.0\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1{0}^{5}<{g}_{\mathrm{NL}}<4.9\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1{0}^{5}$ (all at 95% C.L.). Introducing a running parameter ${n}_{{f}_{\mathrm{NL}}}$ to constrain $b(k)\ensuremath{\propto}{k}^{\ensuremath{-}2+{n}_{{f}_{\mathrm{NL}}}}$ and a generalized PNG amplitude ${\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{f}}_{\mathrm{NL}}$, we obtain $\ensuremath{-}45.5\text{ }\mathrm{exp}(3.7{n}_{{f}_{\mathrm{NL}}})<{\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{f}}_{\mathrm{NL}}<34.4\text{ }\mathrm{exp}(3.3{n}_{{f}_{\mathrm{NL}}})$ at 95% C.L. These results incorporate uncertainties in the cosmological parameters, redshift distributions, shot noise, and the bias prescription used to relate the quasar clustering to the underlying dark matter. These are the strongest constraints obtained to date on PNG using a single population of large-scale structure tracers, and are already at the level of pre-Planck constraints from the cosmic microwave background. A conservative forecast for a Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST)-like survey incorporating mode projection yields $\ensuremath{\sigma}({f}_{\mathrm{NL}})\ensuremath{\sim}5$---competitive with the Planck result---highlighting the power of upcoming large scale structure surveys to probe the initial conditions of the Universe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.113.221301

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Measurements of the galaxy power spectrum on very large scales are challenging because of sky systematics and cosmic variance.

    “Although measurements of the galaxy power spectrum on very large scales are challenging owing to sky systematics ( Leistedt et al. 2014 ) and cosmic variance, the prospect of using multiple tracers of the same fi eld could signi fi cantly improve the constraining power for this observable ( Seljak 2009 ) .”

    From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Leistedt et al. 2014

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 116 · Cited by 119

Authors
Leistedt, B., Peiris, H. V., & Roth, N.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2014-11-25
Volume
113
Issue
22
Pages
221301-221301
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2051348302
Cited by
119
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 3
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • The Impact Fund
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council
  • European Research Council (306478-CosmicDawn)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Higher Education Funding Council for England
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • European Community&rsquo;s Seventh Framework Programme
  • Japanese Monbukagakusho
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
primordial non-Gaussianity, quasar clustering, halo bias, blind analysis, f_NL, scale-dependent bias, Sloan Digital Sky Survey, cosmological constraints, redshift-space correlation function, shot noise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review