The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized Benchmarking of Single-Qubit Gates in a 2D Array of Neutral-Atom Qubits
Open accessAbstract
We characterize single-qubit Clifford gate operations with randomized benchmarking in a 2D array of neutral-atom qubits and demonstrate global and site selected gates with high fidelity. An average fidelity of F2=0.9983(14) is measured for global microwave-driven gates applied to a 49-qubit array. Single-site gates are implemented with a focused laser beam to Stark shift the microwaves into resonance at a selected site. At Stark selected single sites we observe F2=0.9923(7) and an average spin-flip crosstalk error at other sites of 0.002(9).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In neutral atom quantum computers, the amount of crosstalk is usually moderate [63,64]”
From Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,450
Ladd, T. D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., & O’Brien, J. L. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08812 · Cited by 3,592
Randomized benchmarking of quantum gates
Knill, E., Leibfried, D., Reichle, R., Britton, J., Blakestad, R. B., Jost, J. D., Langer, C., Ozeri, R., Seidelin, S., & Wineland, D. J. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.012307 · Cited by 1,019
An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity
Veldhorst, M., Hwang, J. C. C., Yang, C. H., Leenstra, A., de Ronde, B., Dehollain, J. P., Muhonen, J. T., Hudson, F. E., Itoh, K. M., Morello, A., et al. (2014) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.216 · Cited by 957
Quantum error correction for beginners
Devitt, S. J., Munro, W. J., & Nemoto, K. (2013) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/7/076001 · Cited by 842
Single-spin addressing in an atomic Mott insulator
Weitenberg, C., Endres, M., Sherson, J. F., Cheneau, M., Schauß, P., Fukuhara, T., Bloch, I., & Kuhr, S. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09827 · Cited by 732
Efficient Measurement of Quantum Gate Error by Interleaved Randomized Benchmarking
Magesan, E., Gambetta, J., Johnson, B., Ryan, C. A., Chow, J. M., Merkel, S., Silva, M. P. D., Keefe, G., Rothwell, M. B., Ohki, T., et al. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.080505 · Cited by 456
Characterization of Addressability by Simultaneous Randomized Benchmarking
Gambetta, J., Corcoles, A. D., Merkel, S., Johnson, B., Smolin, J. A., Chow, J. M., Ryan, C. A., Rigetti, C. T., Poletto, S., Ohki, T., et al. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.240504 · Cited by 313
Schrader, D., Dotsenko, I., Khudaverdyan, M., Miroshnychenko, Y., Rauschenbeutel, A., & Meschede, D. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.150501 · Cited by 274
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–247 of 247
Fast nuclear-spin entangling gates compatible with large-scale atomic arrays
Shi, X., & Lü, Y. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.012610 · Cited by 3
Cavity enhanced measurement of trap frequency in an optical dipole trap
Yang, P., He, H. Y., Wang, Z., Han, X., Li, G., Zhang, P., & Zhang, T. (2019) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/28/4/043701 · Cited by 3
Guo, F.-Q., Zhu, X., Yan, L.-L., Feng, M., & Su, S. (2021) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.202100057 · Cited by 3
Sağlam, U., Walker, T. G., Saffman, M. E., & Yavuz, D. D. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.063711 · Cited by 3
Self-citationBarium-based Rydberg-atom quantum technologies with long Rydberg coherence
Shi, X. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/bbv3-d4ch · Cited by 2
Multi-state detection and spatial addressing in a microscope for ultracold molecules
Mortlock, J. M., Raghuram, A. P., Maddox, B., Gregory, P. D., & Cornish, S. L. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-67212-7 · Cited by 2
Mammola, A., Desjardins, M. M., & Schaeverbeke, Q. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.042621 · Cited by 2
Three-dimensional cooling of a single atom by a pair of counter-propagating tightly focused beams
Li, G., Zhang, P., & Zhang, T. (2015) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.23.023571 · Cited by 2
Correlations between interacting Rydberg atoms
Paris-Mandoki, A., Braun, C., & Hofferberth, S. (2018) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.5031690 · Cited by 3
Experimental progress of quantum computation based on trapped single neutral atoms
Xu, P., He, X., Liu, M., Wang, J., & Zhan, M. (2019) · Acta Physica Sinica · doi:10.7498/aps.68.20182133 · Cited by 2
Govia, L. C. G., Poole, C., Saffman, M. E., & Krovi, H. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.062428 · Cited by 16
Self-citationNeutral atom quantum computers for the applications in condensed matter physics
Shweta, Kaur, I., Singh, N., Kanjilal, S., & Santra, B. (2025) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/adbb9b · Cited by 2
Optical System for Implementing Accurate Two-Qubit Gates on Neutral Atoms
Betleni, P. I., & Beterov, I. I. (2025) · Bulletin of the Lebedev Physics Institute · doi:10.3103/s1068335625600226 · Cited by 1
Keller, T., Kikura, S., Asaoka, R., Suzuki, Y., Tokunaga, Y., & Aoki, T. (2026) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.578833 · Cited by 1
Fidelity relations in an array of neutral atom qubits: Experimental validation of control noise
van Rensburg, D. J., de Keijzer, R., Venderbosch, R., van der Werf, Y., Mellado, J. D. P., Lous, R. S., Vredenbregt, E. J. D., & Kokkelmans, S. J. J. M. F. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/66zh-yt9d · Cited by 2
Gallagher, C., & Ferraro, A. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.052305 · Cited by 1
Clifford-group-restricted eavesdroppers in quantum key distribution
Govia, L. C. G., Bunandar, D., Lin, J., Englund, D. R., Lütkenhaus, N., & Krovi, H. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.062318 · Cited by 1
Measurement of magnetically insensitive state coherent time in blue dipole trap
Li, X., Wang, Z., Li, S.-K., Tian, Y., Li, G., Zhang, P., & Zhang, T. (2020) · Acta Physica Sinica · doi:10.7498/aps.69.20192001 · Cited by 1
Markov Chains and Hitting Times for Error Accumulation in Quantum Circuits
Ma, L., & Sanders, J. (2021) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-92511-6_3 · Cited by 1
Rydberg quantum simulator of topological insulatorsPreprint
Khazali, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
Representing and Probing Errors in Quantum Information Processing Devices
Lin, J. (2018) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo)
Optical Dipole Traps for Single Ions
Karpa, L. (2019) · SpringerBriefs in physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-27716-1_3
Frisch, A., Barowski, H. S., Brink, M., & Roth, P. H. (2020) · The frontiers collection · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18338-7_27
(2019) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.1214
(2019) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.945
(2019) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.1251
(2020) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.1469
(2019) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.940
Bergou, J. A., Hillery, M. S., & Saffman, M. E. (2021) · Graduate texts in physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75436-5_13
Self-citationSağlam, U., Walker, T. G., Saffman, M. E., & Yavuz, D. D. (2022) · doi:10.26226/m.6275705b66d5dcf63a311519
Self-citationHarnessing Bayesian Optimisation for Quantum Information Processing
Martínez-García, F. (2022) · Cronfa (Swansea University) · doi:10.23889/suthesis.60301
(2023) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.6644
(2023) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.6691
(2022) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.6407
Invited: Building Robust Quantum System Software for Technology-Specific Characteristics
Patel, T., & Tiwari, D. (2023) · ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) · doi:10.1109/dac56929.2023.10248010
Report on scipost_202301_00041v1
(2023) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.7055
Report on scipost_202301_00041v1
(2023) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.7038
The Virtual Quantum Device (VQD): A tool for detailed emulation of quantum computers
Gustiani, C., Jones, T., & Benjamin, S. C. (2025) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2025-02-25-1642 · Cited by 5
Liao, Z., Sun, Q., Hu, Y. Z., & Jiang, N. (2025) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.547165
Blind spots of randomized benchmarking under temporal correlations
Srivastava, V., Roy, A. K., Mahanti, S., Kaur, J., Karuvade, S., & Gilchrist, A. (2026) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/r1z5-ycqc · Cited by 3
Nakamura, Y. (2026) · Springer theses · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-2836-3_1
Tighter thermalization bounds for perturbed quantum many-body scars
Meng-yun, M., Sun, Z., & You, W. (2026) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/2hjm-m1v9
Rabi oscillations induced by nonresonant gyrating drive
Kolok, B., & Pályi, A. (2026) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/ffkk-q3g3
Few-body Förster resonances in Rydberg atoms for the implementation of quantum computing
Ashkarin, I. N. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/eebef4cdzf16dz4fbcz9077z90e6d536c474
Refined coherent control of atomic qubits via a wave-function approach conditioned on no-decay
Anonymous (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/zt89-smxw
Matchgate Benchmarking for Rydberg Atom Quantum Processors
Kim, M. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16157614
Towards scalable quantum information processing with cold atoms and Rydberg blockade
Saffman, M. E., Xia, T., Lichtman, M., Maller, K., & Sun, Y. (2015) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.2178534
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Xia, T., Lichtman, M., Maller, K., Carr, A. W., Piotrowicz, M. J., Isenhower, L., & Saffman, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2015-03-12
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 100503-100503
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2011109561
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 23.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Army Research Office (W911NF-10-1-0347)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- randomized benchmarking, single-qubit gates, neutral atom qubits, Clifford gates, gate fidelity, Stark shift, focused laser beam
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
