Cited by 40Laser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies

Ultrafast Charge Transfer of a Valence Double Hole in Glycine Driven Exclusively by Nuclear Motion

Open access
Li, Zheng, Vendrell, Oriol, Santra, Robin·2015·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We explore theoretically the ultrafast transfer of a double electron hole between the functional groups of glycine after K-shell ionization and subsequent Auger decay. Although a large energy gap of about 15 eV initially exists between the two electronic states involved and coherent electronic dynamics play no role in the hole transfer, we find that the double hole is transferred within 3 to 4 fs between both functional ends of the glycine molecule driven solely by specific nuclear displacements and non-Born-Oppenheimer effects. The nuclear displacements along specific vibrational modes are of the order of 15% of a typical chemical bond between carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen atoms and about 30% for bonds involving hydrogen atoms. The time required for the hole transfer corresponds to less than half a vibrational period of the involved nuclear modes. This finding challenges the common wisdom that nuclear dynamics of the molecular skeleton are unimportant for charge transfer processes at the few-femtosecond time scale and shows that they can even play a prominent role. It also indicates that in x-ray imaging experiments, in which ionization is unavoidable, valence electron redistribution caused by nuclear dynamics might be much faster than previously anticipated. Thus, non-Born-Oppenheimer effects may affect the apparent electron densities extracted from such measurements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.115.143002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few-fs transfer dynamics of a double valence hole created by core-shell ionization and Auger decay might be barely accessible with few-fs pulses at LCLS, while sub-fs charge migration is currently beyond reach.

    “while the few-fs transfer dynamics of a double valence hole [88] created by core-shell ionization and subsequent Auger decay might be barely accessible with the few-fs pulses available at the LCLS, sub-fs charge migration discussed in [81] is currently beyond reach.”

    From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [88]

  • Calculations on small biomolecules indicate that proton dynamics combined with non-Born-Oppenheimer effects can lead to electron redistribution on the time scale of one femtosecond [88].

    “Calculations on small biomolecules indicate that proton dynamics combined with non-Born-Oppenheimer effects can lead to electron redistribution on the time scale of one femtosecond [88].”

    From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [88]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 40

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. M. Barbatti, R. Shepard, and H. Lischka, in Conical Intersections: Theory, Computation and Experiment, edited by W. Domcke, D. R. Yarkony, and H. Köppel (World Scientific, Singapore, 2011), p. 415.
  2. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/ supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.143002, which in- cludes Refs. [-35]. Details on the electronic structure and Auger spectra calculations and on the location of the relevant conical intersection.

Authors
Li, Z., Vendrell, O., & Santra, R.
Affiliations
  • Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY (DE)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2015-10-02
Volume
115
Issue
14
Pages
143002-143002
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2231731832
Cited by
40
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Desy publication database (The Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Volkswagen Foundation
  • Hamburg Centre for Ultrafast Imaging
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Keywords
ultrafast charge transfer, glycine, K-shell ionization, Auger decay, nuclear motion, non-Born-Oppenheimer effects, vibrational modes, radiography
MeSH terms
Electrons, Glycine, Models, Theoretical, Thermodynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review