Cited by 105Topological Materials and PhenomenaQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systems

Direct Probe of Topological Invariants Using Bloch Oscillating Quantum Walks

Open access
Ramasesh, V. V., Flurin, E., Rudner, M., Siddiqi, I., Yao, N. Y.·2017·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The topology of a single-particle band structure plays a fundamental role in understanding a multitude of physical phenomena. Motivated by the connection between quantum walks and such topological band structures, we demonstrate that a simple time-dependent, Bloch-oscillating quantum walk enables the direct measurement of topological invariants. We consider two classes of one-dimensional quantum walks and connect the global phase imprinted on the walker with its refocusing behavior. By disentangling the dynamical and geometric contributions to this phase, we describe a general strategy to measure the topological invariant in these quantum walks. As an example, we propose an experimental protocol in a circuit QED architecture where a superconducting transmon qubit plays the role of the coin, while the quantum walk takes place in the phase space of a cavity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.118.130501

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The circuit-based implementations reported to date are a DQW on a three-qubit NMR system, a CQW on a two-qubit photonic processor, and a split-step QW on superconducting circuits.

    “The implementation of a DQW on a three-qubit NMR system36, a CQW on a two-qubit photonic processor37 and a split-step QW on superconducting circuits38,39 are the circuit-based implementations reported to date.”

    From Quantum walks and Dirac cellular automata on a programmable trapped-ion quantum computer (2020) · cites this paper as [38]

    The paper describes a split-step quantum walk in a superconducting circuit-QED architecture, but calls it a proposed experimental realization, not a reported implementation (p. 1). Its “Experimental realization” section likewise presents an experimental blueprint (p. 4). (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramasesh, V. V., Flurin, E., Rudner, M., Siddiqi, I., & Yao, N. Y.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2017-03-27
Volume
118
Issue
13
Pages
130501-130501
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2529776492
Cited by
105
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Adolph C. and Mary Sprague Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, University of California Berkeley
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-15-1-0496)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-12-1-0378)
  • Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)
  • Research Executive Agency (PIIF-GA-2013-627838)
  • National Science Foundation
  • Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
topological invariants, quantum walks, Bloch oscillations, topological band structure, global phase, refocusing, circuit quantum electrodynamics, transmon qubits, one-dimensional quantum walk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review