Cited by 70Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum chaos and dynamical systemsAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics

Nonexponential quantum decay under environmental decoherence

Open access
Beau, M., Kiukas, J., Egusquiza, I. L., del Campo, A.·2017·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

A system prepared in an unstable quantum state generally decays following an exponential law, as environmental decoherence is expected to prevent the decay products from recombining to reconstruct the initial state. Here we show the existence of deviations from exponential decay in open quantum systems under very general conditions. Our results are illustrated with the exact dynamics under quantum Brownian motion and suggest an explanation of recent experimental observations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.119.130401

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 70

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]M. Hübner, Phys. Lett. A 179 , 226 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(9291004-B) · DOI
  2. [8]W. H. Zurek, Physics Today 44 , 10, 36 (1991). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.8812939 · DOI

Authors
Beau, M., Kiukas, J., Egusquiza, I. L., & del Campo, A.
Affiliations
  • Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies (IE)
  • Aberystwyth University (GB)
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2017-09-27
Volume
119
Issue
13
Pages
130401-130401
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2667520185
Cited by
70
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (P20150000029279)
  • European Social Fund (POLATOM-5052)
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
  • Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras (FIS2015-69983-P)
  • Eusko Jaurlaritza (IT986-16)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Keywords
non-exponential decay, quantum decay, environmental decoherence, open quantum systems, quantum Brownian motion, exact dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review