The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental Demonstration of Fault-Tolerant State Preparation with Superconducting Qubits
Open accessAbstract
Robust quantum computation requires encoding delicate quantum information into degrees of freedom that are hard for the environment to change. Quantum encodings have been demonstrated in many physical systems by observing and correcting storage errors, but applications require not just storing information; we must accurately compute even with faulty operations. The theory of fault-tolerant quantum computing illuminates a way forward by providing a foundation and collection of techniques for limiting the spread of errors. Here we implement one of the smallest quantum codes in a five-qubit superconducting transmon device and demonstrate fault-tolerant state preparation. We characterize the resulting code words through quantum process tomography and study the free evolution of the logical observables. Our results are consistent with fault-tolerant state preparation in a protected qubit subspace.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Methods such as randomized benchmarking [5], state and process tomography [6], and gateset tomography [7] are valued for measuring the performance of operations on a few qubits, yet they fail to account for errors arising from interactions with spectator qubits [8, 9].”
From Validating quantum computers using randomized model circuits (2019) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,450
Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits
Ofek, N., Petrenko, A., Heeres, R., Reinhold, P., Leghtas, Z., Vlastakis, B., Liu, Y., Frunzio, L., Girvin, S. M., Jiang, L., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18949 · Cited by 941
State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit
Kelly, J., Barends, R., Fowler, A. G., Megrant, A., Jeffrey, E. R., White, T., Sank, D., Mutus, J., Campbell, B., Chen, Y., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14270 · Cited by 933
Scalable and Robust Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Processes
Magesan, E., Gambetta, J., & Emerson, J. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.180504 · Cited by 797
Self-citationEfficient Z gates for quantum computing
McKay, D. C., Wood, C. J., Sheldon, S., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.022330 · Cited by 614
Self-citationRealization of three-qubit quantum error correction with superconducting circuits
Reed, M. D., DiCarlo, L., Nigg, S. E., Sun, L., Frunzio, L., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10786 · Cited by 601
Bilinear rotation decoupling of homonuclear scalar interactions
Garbow, J. R., Weitekamp, D. P., & Pines, A. (1982) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/0009-2614(82)83229-6 · Cited by 596
Corcoles, A. D., Magesan, E., Srinivasan, S. J., Cross, A. W., Steffen, M., Gambetta, J., & Chow, J. M. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7979 · Cited by 495
Self-citationSimple All-Microwave Entangling Gate for Fixed-Frequency Superconducting Qubits
Chow, J. M., Corcoles, A. D., Gambetta, J., Rigetti, C. T., Johnson, B., Smolin, J. A., Rozen, J., Keefe, G., Rothwell, M. B., Ketchen, M. B., et al. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.080502 · Cited by 463
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 229
Characterization of entanglement on superconducting quantum computers of up to 414 qubits
Kam, J. F., Kang, H., Hill, C. D., Mooney, G. J., & Hollenberg, L. C. L. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033155 · Cited by 32
Heya, K., & Kanazawa, N. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040336 · Cited by 25
Data-driven decoding of quantum error correcting codes using graph neural networks
Lange, M., Havström, P., Srivastava, B., Bengtsson, I., Bergentall, V., Hammar, K., Heuts, O., van Nieuwenburg, E., & Granath, M. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.023181 · Cited by 45
Quantum computation and simulation with superconducting qubits*
He, K., Geng, X., Huang, R., Liu, J., & Chen, W. (2021) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ac16cf · Cited by 24
The XYZ 2 hexagonal stabilizer code
Srivastava, B., Kockum, A. F., & Granath, M. (2022) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2022-04-27-698 · Cited by 25
Experimental fault-tolerant code switching
Pogorelov, I., Butt, F., Postler, L., Marciniak, C. D., Schindler, P., Müller, M., & Monz, T. (2025) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02727-2 · Cited by 49
Experimental error suppression in Cross-Resonance gates via multi-derivative pulse shaping
Li, B., Calarco, T., & Motzoi, F. (2024) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-024-00863-4 · Cited by 27
Rosset, D., Gisin, N., & Wolfe, E. (2018) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic18.11-12 · Cited by 23
Coupler-Assisted Leakage Reduction for Scalable Quantum Error Correction with Superconducting Qubits
Yang, X., Chu, J., Guo, Z., Huang, W., Liang, Y., Liu, J., Qiu, J., Sun, X., Tao, Z., Zhang, J., et al. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.170601 · Cited by 23
Manenti, R., & Motta, M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198787488.005.0002 · Cited by 20
Improving readout in quantum simulations with repetition codes
Günther, J., Tacchino, F., Wootton, J. R., Tavernelli, I., & Barkoutsos, P. K. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac3386 · Cited by 24
Evaluation of Parameterized Quantum Circuits With Cross-Resonance Pulse-Driven Entanglers
Ibrahim, M. M. A., Mohammadbagherpoor, H., Rios, C., Bronn, N. T., & Byrd, G. T. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2022.3231124 · Cited by 27
Multi-qubit dynamical decoupling for enhanced crosstalk suppression
Niu, S., Todri‐Sanial, A., & Bronn, N. T. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad5a37 · Cited by 24
Superconducting qubits beyond the dispersive regime
Ansari, M. H. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.024509 · Cited by 21
An architecture for two-qubit encoding in neutral ytterbium-171 atoms
Jia, Z., Huie, W., Li, L., Sun, W. K. C., Hu, X., Aakash, A., Kogan, H., Karve, A., Lee, J. Y., & Covey, J. P. (2024) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-024-00898-7 · Cited by 23
Characterization of hidden modes in networks of superconducting qubits
Sheldon, S., Sandberg, M., Paik, H., Abdo, B., Chow, J. M., Steffen, M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.4990033 · Cited by 18
Self-citationImproved Variational Quantum Eigensolver Via Quasidynamical Evolution
Jattana, M. S., Jin, F., Raedt, H. A. D., & Michielsen, K. F. L. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.19.024047 · Cited by 26
A cellular automaton decoder for a noise-bias tailored color code
Miguel, J. F. S., Williamson, D. J., & Brown, B. J. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-03-09-940 · Cited by 18
Quantum Computing Technology and Roadmap
Riel, H. (2022) · European Solid-State Device Research Conference · doi:10.1109/essderc55479.2022.9947181 · Cited by 16
Quantum error correction with the color-Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code
Zhang, J., Zhao, J., Wu, Y.-C., & Guo, G. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.062434 · Cited by 15
Time-Dependent Hamiltonian Reconstruction Using Continuous Weak Measurements
Siva, K., Koolstra, G., Steinmetz, J., Livingston, W. P., Das, D., Chen, L., Kreikebaum, J. M., Stevenson, N. J., Jünger, C., Santiago, D., et al. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.040324 · Cited by 17
Stade, Y., Schmid, L., Burgholzer, L., & Wille, R. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce60285.2024.00098 · Cited by 15
Comparative study of quantum error correction strategies for the heavy-hexagonal lattice
Benito, C., López, E., Peropadre, B., & Bermúdez, A. (2025) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2025-02-06-1623 · Cited by 26
Direct Calculation of Z Z Interaction Rates in Multimode Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics
Solgun, F., & Srinivasan, S. J. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.044025 · Cited by 13
Design of quantum error correcting code for biased error on heavy-hexagon structure
Kim, Y.-H., Kang, J., & Kwon, Y. (2023) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-023-03979-2 · Cited by 13
Manenti, R., & Motta, M. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198787488.001.0001 · Cited by 15
Engineering cross resonance interaction in multi-modal quantum circuits
Hazra, S., Salunkhe, K. V., Bhattacharjee, A., Bothara, G., Kundu, S., Roy, T., Patankar, M. P., & Vijay, R. (2020) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.5143440 · Cited by 12
A simple protocol for fault tolerant verification of quantum computation
Gheorghiu, A., Hoban, M. J., & Kashefi, E. (2018) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aaeeb3 · Cited by 14
Towards Quantum Gravity in the Lab on Quantum Processors
Shapoval, I., Su, V. P., de Jong, W. A., Urbánek, M., & Swingle, B. G. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-10-12-1138 · Cited by 18
Takahashi, T., Kouma, N., Doi, Y., Sato, S., Tamate, S., & Nakamura, Y. (2022) · Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.35848/1347-4065/aca256 · Cited by 13
Beating the classical limits of information transmission using a quantum decoder
Chapman, R. J., Karim, A., Huang, Z., Flammia, S. T., Tomamichel, M., & Peruzzo, A. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.012315 · Cited by 13
Density matrix simulation of quantum error correction codes for near-term quantum devices
Baek, C., Ostuka, T., Tarucha, S., & Choi, B.-S. (2019) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab5887 · Cited by 12
A Review of Developments in Superconducting Quantum Processors
Mamgain, A., Khaire, S. S., Singhal, U., Ahmad, I., Patel, L., Helambe, K. D., Majumder, S., Singh, V., & Suri, B. (2022) · Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · doi:10.1007/s41745-022-00330-z · Cited by 11
de la Fuente, J. C. M., Old, J., Townsend-Teague, A., Rispler, M., Eisert, J., & Müller, M. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.6.010360 · Cited by 18
Low-temperature environments for quantum computation and quantum simulation*
Fu, H., Wang, P., Hu, Z., Li, Y., & Lin, X. (2020) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/abd762 · Cited by 10
Optical demonstration of quantum fault-tolerant threshold
Sun, K., Hao, Z.-Y., Wang, Y., Li, J.-K., Xu, X.-Y., Xu, J., Han, Y., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2022) · Light Science & Applications · doi:10.1038/s41377-022-00891-9 · Cited by 10
Error-rate-agnostic decoding of topological stabilizer codes
Hammar, K., Orekhov, A., Hybelius, P. W., Wisakanto, A. K., Srivastava, B., Kockum, A. F., & Granath, M. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.042616 · Cited by 10
Magnetization revivals and dynamics of quantum correlations in a Kitaev spin chain
Vimal, V. K., & Subrahmanyam, V. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.012406 · Cited by 9
McBroom, T., Schlabes, A., Xu, X., Ku, J., Cole, B., Indrajeet, S., LaHaye, M., Ansari, M. H., & Plourde, B. L. T. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.020325 · Cited by 8
Liou, P.-H., & Lai, C. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.022614 · Cited by 8
Kubo, K., Ho, Y., & Goto, H. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.024057 · Cited by 8
Designing arbitrary single-axis rotations robust against perpendicular time-dependent noise
Li, B., Calderon-Vargas, F. A., Zeng, J., & Barnes, E. (2021) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac22ea · Cited by 11
Towards a realistic GaAs-spin qubit device for a classical error-corrected quantum memory
Rispler, M., Cerfontaine, P., Langrock, V., & Terhal, B. M. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.022416 · Cited by 8
Floquet analysis of frequency collisions
Heya, K., Malekakhlagh, M., Merkel, S., Kanazawa, N., & Pritchett, E. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.21.024035 · Cited by 10
Feedback-Based Steering for Quantum State Preparation
Volya, D., Pan, Z., & Mishra, P. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce57702.2023.00148 · Cited by 6
Experimental Characterization of Fault-Tolerant Circuits in Small-Scale Quantum Processors
Cane, R., Chandra, D., Ng, S. X., & Hanzo, L. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3133483 · Cited by 10
Optimized Bayesian system identification in quantum devices
Stace, T. M., Chen, J., Li, L., Perunicic, V. S., Carvalho, A. R. R., Hush, M., Valahu, C. H., Tan, T. R., & Biercuk, M. J. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.21.014012 · Cited by 10
Robust gates with spin-locked superconducting qubits
Zuk, I., Cohen, D., Gorshkov, A. V., & Retzker, A. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.013217 · Cited by 7
Coherent errors in stabilizer codes caused by quasistatic phase damping
Pataki, D., Márton, Á., Asbóth, J. K., & Pályi, A. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.012417 · Cited by 6
Engineering electro-optics in SiGe/Si waveguides for quantum transduction
Orcutt, J. S., Paik, H., Bishop, L. S., Xiong, C., Schilling, R., & Falk, A. L. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab84c1 · Cited by 6
Quantum Codes From Classical Graphical Models
Roffe, J., Zohren, S., Horsman, D., & Chancellor, N. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2019.2938751 · Cited by 9
Quantum codes from classical graphical models
Roffe, J., Zohren, S., Horsman, D. C., & Chancellor, N. (2020) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 6
Syncopated dynamical decoupling to suppress crosstalk in quantum circuits
Evert, B., Izquierdo, Z. G., Sud, J., Hu, H.-Y., Grabbe, S. R., Rieffel, E. G., Reagor, M. J., & Wang, Z. (2025) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/8lxc-lvv1 · Cited by 5
A digitally controlled silicon quantum processing unit
Members of the HRL Quantum Team and Collaborators, Abraham, M., Acuna, E., Adams, T. S., Akmal, M., Alfaro, M. R., Alvarado, I., Amontree, J., Andrews, C., Andrews, R. W., et al. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10754-7 · Cited by 5
Hybrid quantum error correction in qubit architectures
Kristensen, L. B., Kjærgaard, M., Andersen, C. K., & Zinner, N. T. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.022403 · Cited by 9
Advances in quantum error correction based on superconducting quantum systems
Chen, Z.-J., Pan, X., Hua, Z., Wang, W., Ma, Y., Li, M., Zou, X., Sun, L., & Zou, C. (2022) · Acta Physica Sinica · doi:10.7498/aps.71.20221824 · Cited by 5
Reducing Quantum Error Correction Overhead With Versatile Flag-Sharing Syndrome Extraction Circuits
Liou, P.-H., & Lai, C. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2025.3572764 · Cited by 5
Theoretical and practical aspects of verification of quantum computers
Naveh, Y., Kashefi, E., Wootton, J. R., & Bertels, K. (2018) · Design, Automation, and Test in Europe · doi:10.23919/date.2018.8342103 · Cited by 6
Toward Scalable Superconducting Quantum Computer Implementation
Tabuchi, Y., Tamate, S., & Nakamura, Y. (2019) · IEICE Transactions on Electronics · doi:10.1587/transele.2018sdp0001 · Cited by 5
Benchmarking quantum processors with a single qubit
Göktaş, O., Tham, W. K., Bonsma-Fisher, K., & Brodutch, A. (2020) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-020-02642-4 · Cited by 6
Quantum Error Detection in Qubit-Resonator Star Architecture
Vigneau, F., Majumder, S., Rath, A., Parrado-Rodríguez, P., Pereira, F. R. F., Ku, H.-S., Šimkovic, F., Pogorzalek, S., Jones, T., Wurz, N., et al. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/8m33-wn4g · Cited by 7
Multi-Mode Bus Coupling Architecture of Superconducting Quantum Processor
Zhao, C., He, Y., Xiao, G., He, K., Dai, G., Liu, J., & Chen, W. (2022) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/40/01/010301 · Cited by 4
Exact results on finite size corrections for surface codes tailored to biased noise
Xiao, Y., Srivastava, B., & Granath, M. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-09-11-1468 · Cited by 7
Singh, R. K., Panda, B., Behera, B. K., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2022) · IET Quantum Communication · doi:10.1049/qtc2.12043 · Cited by 12
Supercomputer simulations of transmon quantum computers
Willsch, D. (2020) · RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) · doi:10.18154/rwth-2020-08027 · Cited by 7
Glisic, S., & Lorenzo, B. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119790327.ch10 · Cited by 4
The resource cost of large scale quantum computingPreprint
Fellous-Asiani, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.04022 · Cited by 4
Reconfiguring quantum error-correcting codes for real-life errors
Ahsan, M., & Naqvi, S. A. Z. (2020) · Journal of Physics D Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6463/ab96eb · Cited by 3
Digital Quantum Simulation of Nonadiabatic Geometric Gates via Shortcuts to Adiabaticity
Wang, Y., Ding, Y., Wang, J., & Chen, X. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e22101175 · Cited by 3
Distance-four quantum codes with combined postselection and error correction
Prabhu, P., & Reichardt, B. W. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.012419 · Cited by 5
Approaching the chaotic regime with a fully connected superconducting quantum processor
Li, K.-M., Dong, H., Song, C., & Wang, H. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.062302 · Cited by 3
Experimental deterministic correction of qubit loss [1]
Stricker, R., Vodola, D., Erhard, A., Postler, L., Meth, M., Ringbauer, M., Schindler, P., Monz, T., Müller, M., & Blatt, R. (2021) · Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC) · doi:10.1109/cleo/europe-eqec52157.2021.9542428 · Cited by 3
Zhao, Y., & Liu, D. E. (2025) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf063 · Cited by 4
Strinati, M. C., & Conti, C. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.043712 · Cited by 2
Q-Pandora Unboxed: Characterizing Resilience of Quantum Error Correction Codes Under Biased Noise
Chatterjee, A., Das, S. K., & Ghosh, S. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15084555 · Cited by 3
High-contrast interaction between remote superconducting qubits mediated by multimode cable coupling
Zhang, J., Chu, J., Niu, J., Zhong, Y., & Yu, D. (2025) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0280529 · Cited by 2
Dynamics of entanglement creation between two spins coupled to a chain
Wendenbaum, P., Taketani, B. G., Kajari, E., Morigi, G., & Karevski, D. (2020) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00225-x · Cited by 2
Resource Optimal Realization of Fault-Tolerant Quantum Circuit
Kole, A., & Sengupta, I. (2020) · IEEE International Test Conference India (ITC India) · doi:10.1109/itcindia49857.2020.9171796 · Cited by 3
Quantum correlations in a cluster spin model with three-spin interactions
Sadaf, F., & Subrahmanyam, V. (2025) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/adc218 · Cited by 2
Demonstration of high-fidelity entangled logical qubits using transmons
Vezvaee, A., Tripathi, V., Morford-Oberst, M., Butt, F., Kasatkin, V., & Lidar, D. A. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-70011-3 · Cited by 8
Bai, X.-Y., & Zhang, S. (2022) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ac4f54 · Cited by 1
Stable quantum memories with limited measurement
Freeman, C. D., Sarovar, M., Herdman, C. M., & Whaley, K. B. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.032322 · Cited by 1
Scaling Up Bit-Flip Quantum Error Correction
Feroz, F., & Islam, A. B. M. A. A. (2020) · International Conference on Networking, Systems and Security (NSysS) · doi:10.1145/3428363.3428372 · Cited by 1
Characterization and implementation of robust quantum information processing
Fernandez, D. (2020) · Cronfa (Swansea University) · doi:10.23889/suthesis.56913 · Cited by 1
Manenti, R., & Motta, M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198787488.005.0003 · Cited by 1
Q-Pandora Unboxed: Characterizing Noise Resilience of Quantum Error Correction CodesPreprint
Chatterjee, A., Das, S. K., & Ghosh, S. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3663236/v1 · Cited by 1
Two-photon exchange interaction from the Dicke Hamiltonian under parametric modulation
Dodonov, A. V. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.023816
The Toric Code at Finite Temperature
Freeman, C. D. (2018) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Simulated randomized benchmarking of a dynamically corrected cross-resonance gate
Colmenar, R. K., Güngördü, U., & Kestner, J. P. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.032626
Direct calculation of the ZZ-interaction rates in the multi-mode circuit-QEDPreprint
Solgun, F., & Srinivasan, S. J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.05765
Glisic, S., & Lorenzo, B. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119790327.ch1
Fault-Tolerant Code Switching Protocols for Near-Term Quantum ProcessorsPreprint
Butt, F., Heußen, S., Rispler, M., & Müller, M. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.17686
Manenti, R., & Motta, M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198787488.003.0006
Microwave resonators for superconducting devices
Manenti, R., & Motta, M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198787488.003.0013
(2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198787488.002.0003
The rotating wave approximation
Manenti, R., & Motta, M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198787488.005.0001
Manenti, R., & Motta, M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198787488.003.0004
Manenti, R., & Motta, M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198787488.003.0007
Quantum simulation of Hamiltonian eigenstates
Manenti, R., & Motta, M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198787488.003.0012
Manenti, R., & Motta, M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198787488.003.0002
Metadata
- Authors
- Takita, M., Cross, A. W., Córcoles, A. D., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M.
- Affiliations
- IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2017-10-31
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 180501-180501
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2619719596
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 13.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (W911NF-16-0114)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-14-1-0124)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- fault-tolerant quantum computing, quantum state preparation, superconducting qubits, transmon qubits, five-qubit code, quantum error correction, quantum process tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
