The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic Monopoles in Grand Unified Theories
Open accessAbstract
It is suggested that the magnetic monopoles predicted by grand unified theories would not be produced in significant numbers if electromagnetic gauge invariance is spontaneously broken when the temperature $T$ is greater than ${T}_{c}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}1$ TeV. A model possessing this behavior is displayed and the cosmological implications are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physical consequences of a general excess of charge
Lyttleton, R. A., & Bondi, H. (1959) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1959.0155 · Cited by 98
Cited by
Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems
Guth, A. H. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.347 · Cited by 9,983
The Universe in a Helium Droplet
Volovik, G. E. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199564842.001.0001 · Cited by 2,632
Initial conditions for inflation
Goldwirth, D. S., & Piran, T. (1992) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(92)90073-9 · Cited by 232
Causality and cosmic inflation
Vachaspati, T., & Trodden, M. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.023502 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Langacker, P., & Pi, S.-Y.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1980-07-07
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-4
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070050100
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic Monopoles in Grand Unified Theories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.45.1
- The paper
- Langacker, P., & Pi, S.-Y. (1980). Magnetic Monopoles in Grand Unified Theories. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.45.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
