Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 717

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

High-Strain-Rate Plastic Flow Studied via Nonequilibrium Molecular Dynamics

Hoover, William G., Ladd, Anthony J. C., Moran, Bill·1982·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Recent experiments at strain rates reaching 0.1 GHz suggest a power-law dependence of solid-phase shear stress on strain rate. Novel nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations of plastic flow have been carried out. These steady-state isothermal calculations appear to be consistent with the present-day experimental data and suggest that the flows of metals can be described by a single physical mechanism over a range of strain rates from 10 kHz to 1 THz.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.48.1818

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hoover, W. G., Ladd, A. J. C., & Moran, B.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1982-06-28
Volume
48
Issue
26
Pages
1818-1820
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026355710
Cited by
717
References
0
FWCI
14.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.