Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 506

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accurate Density Functional for the Energy: Real-Space Cutoff of the Gradient Expansion for the Exchange Hole

Perdew, John P.·1985·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The density-gradient expansion of the fermion exchange hole is analyzed in real space. Unlike the local-density approximation, the second-order gradient-expansion approximation is found to violate two important properties of the exact hole: The exact hole is negative everywhere, and represents a deficit of one electron. Imposition of these exact constraints leads to an accurate new density functional for the exchange energy. Residual errors in the exchange energy for atoms are about 1% of this quantity. The new functional approximation may be generalized to include correlation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.55.1665

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 506

Metadata

Authors
Perdew, J. P.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1985-10-14
Volume
55
Issue
16
Pages
1665-1668
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019769300
Cited by
506
References
1
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.