Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 595

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Inhibition of Atomic Phase Decays by Squeezed Light: A Direct Effect of Squeezing

Gardiner, C. W.·1986·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

By reduction of the electromagnetic field fluctations in one quadrature phase, squeezed light can inhibit the phase decay of an atom. This gives three relaxation times: the usual longitudinal relaxation time and two different transverse relaxation times, which are inversely proportional to the variances of the two quadrature phases of the incident light. With sufficient reduction of one variance, the corresponding relaxation time can be made arbitrarily long. The two transverse decay times are observable in the spectrum of the fluorescent light, thus providing measure of the squeezing in the incident light.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.56.1917

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 595

Metadata

Authors
Gardiner, C. W.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1986-05-05
Volume
56
Issue
18
Pages
1917-1920
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024114831
Cited by
595
References
0
FWCI
14.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhibition of Atomic Phase Decays by Squeezed Light: A Direct Effect of Squeezing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.56.1917
The paper
Gardiner, C. W. (1986). Inhibition of Atomic Phase Decays by Squeezed Light: A Direct Effect of Squeezing. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.56.1917

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.