Cited by 146Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Spin-dominated inflation in the Einstein-Cartan theory

Gasperini, M.·1986·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

In the framework of the simplest Einstein-Cartan generalization of the standard cosmological model, it is shown that an inflationary phase may occur at a sufficiently early epoch, during which the dominant contributions to the effective energy-momentum tensor are represented by the spin density of the matter sources. The general features of this inflationary scenario are briefly discussed, and in particular the possibility of obtaining an expansion rate different from that of the standard exponential inflation is stressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.56.2873

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the comoving frame, the Einstein field Equation (6) for the FLRW metric becomes the Friedmann equations (10) and (11).

    “In the comoving frame of reference, in which the four-velocity u i of the cosmological spin fluid satisfies u 0 =1 and u α =0 (α denotes spatial indices), the Einstein field Equation (6) for this metric becomes the Friedmann equations (the cosmological constant is negligible in the early universe; Kuchowicz 1978;Gasperini 1986;Brechet et al. 2008;Popławski 2010cPopławski , 2011a)):”

    From UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY (2016) · cites this paper as Gasperini 1986

  • The square of the spin density for a fluid consisting of fermions with no spin polarization is given by Equation (8).

    “The square of the spin density for a fluid consisting of fermions with no spin polarization is given by (Nurgaliev & Ponomariev 1983;Gasperini 1986;Brechet et al. 2008”

    From UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY (2016) · cites this paper as Gasperini 1986

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gasperini, M.
Affiliations
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Torino (IT)
Corresponding author
Gasperini, M.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1986-06-30
Volume
56
Issue
26
Pages
2873-2876
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088368747
Cited by
146
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
Einstein-Cartan theory, spin density, early universe inflation, effective stress-energy tensor, modified gravity, Hubble parameter, exponential inflation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review