Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 979

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Why the Brazil nuts are on top: Size segregation of particulate matter by shaking

Rosato, Anthony, Strandburg, Katherine J., Prinz, Friedrich, Swendsen, Robert H.·1987·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

When a can containing one large ball and a number of smaller ones is shaken, the large ball rises to the top, even when the larger ball is more dense than the others. Similarly, a mixture of different sized particles will segregate by size when shaken. An adaptation of the Monte Carlo method is used to study this size segregation. The results show the local, geometric mechanism by which the segregation is produced. Segregation by size is to be distinguished from the more obvious sifting process which occurs when tiny grains filter down through the interstices between large particles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.58.1038

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 979

Metadata

Authors
Rosato, A., Strandburg, K. J., Prinz, F., & Swendsen, R. H.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1987-03-09
Volume
58
Issue
10
Pages
1038-1040
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007332182
Cited by
979
References
0
FWCI
11.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why the Brazil nuts are on top: Size segregation of particulate matter by shaking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.58.1038
The paper
Rosato, A., Strandburg, K. J., Prinz, F., & Swendsen, R. H. (1987). Why the Brazil nuts are on top: Size segregation of particulate matter by shaking. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.58.1038

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.