Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,524

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Force fields for silicas and aluminophosphates based on ab initio calculations

Open access
van Beest, B. W. H., Kramer, G. J., van Santen, R. A.·1990·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We address the problem of finding interatomic force fields for silicas from ab initio calculations on small clusters. It is shown that the force field cannot be determined from cluster data alone; incorporation of bulk-system information into the force field remains essential. Bearing this in mind, we derive a force field based on both microscopic (ab initio) and macroscopic (experimental) data. This force field combines accuracy with transferability to other polymorphs. The possibility of parametrizing other elements is also demonstrated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.64.1955

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,524

Metadata

Authors
van Beest, B. W. H., Kramer, G. J., & van Santen, R. A.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1990-04-16
Volume
64
Issue
16
Pages
1955-1958
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075545717
Cited by
1,524
References
0
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Force fields for silicas and aluminophosphates based on ab initio calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.64.1955
The paper
van Beest, B. W. H., Kramer, G. J., & van Santen, R. A. (1990). Force fields for silicas and aluminophosphates based on ab initio calculations. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.64.1955

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.