Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 603

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Vacuum Rabi splitting as a feature of linear-dispersion theory: Analysis and experimental observations

Zhu, Yifu, Gauthier, Daniel J., Morin, S. E., Wu, Qilin, Carmichael, H. J., Mossberg, T. W.·1990·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The spectral and temporal response of an optical cavity resonantly coupled to an ensemble of barium atoms has been investigated experimentally. The empty-cavity trnasmission resonances are found to split in the presence of the atoms and, under these conditions, the cavity's temporal response is found to be oscillatory. These effects may be viewed as a manifestation of a vacuum-field Rabi splitting, or as a simple consequence of the linear absorption and dispersion of the intracavity atoms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.64.2499

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 603

Metadata

Authors
Zhu, Y., Gauthier, D. J., Morin, S. E., Wu, Q., Carmichael, H. J., & Mossberg, T. W.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1990-05-21
Volume
64
Issue
21
Pages
2499-2502
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971495169
Cited by
603
References
0
FWCI
8.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vacuum Rabi splitting as a feature of linear-dispersion theory: Analysis and experimental observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.64.2499
The paper
Zhu, Y., Gauthier, D. J., Morin, S. E., Wu, Q., Carmichael, H. J., & Mossberg, T. W. (1990). Vacuum Rabi splitting as a feature of linear-dispersion theory: Analysis and experimental observations. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.64.2499

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.