Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Observation of metallic adhesion using the scanning tunneling microscope

Dürig, U., Züger, O., Pohl, D. W.·1990·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The interaction between an Ir tip and an Ir sample was investigated during normal tunneling operation of the scanning tunneling microscope. Force gradients compatible with metallic adhesion were observed within a range of 2 \AA{} before making contact. Based on the theory of metallic adhesion, a scaling relation is derived which allows the tip geometry and the characteristics of the interaction to be accounted for in a systematic manner.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.65.349

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Dürig, U., Züger, O., & Pohl, D. W.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1990-07-16
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
349-352
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970775732
Cited by
182
References
0
FWCI
29.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observation of metallic adhesion using the scanning tunneling microscope. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.65.349
The paper
Dürig, U., Züger, O., & Pohl, D. W. (1990). Observation of metallic adhesion using the scanning tunneling microscope. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.65.349

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.