Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spatial dark-soliton stripes and grids in self-defocusing materials

Swartzlander, G. A., Andersen, D. R., Regan, J. J., Yin, H., Kaplan, A. E.·1991·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Spatial dark-soliton (SDS) stripes are experimentally found in the transverse plane of a laser beam that passes through a rectilinear diffraction screen before propagating in a self-defocusing nonlinear material. Materials with different mechanisms of nonlinearity manifest the same qualitative results. The SDS nature of the observed phenomenon is verified by numerical simulations of the (2+1)-D nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation, analytical solutions for the (1+1)-D case, and their comparison with experimental data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.66.1583

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Swartzlander, G. A., Andersen, D. R., Regan, J. J., Yin, H., & Kaplan, A. E.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1991-03-25
Volume
66
Issue
12
Pages
1583-1586
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016199390
Cited by
262
References
0
FWCI
18.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial dark-soliton stripes and grids in self-defocusing materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.66.1583
The paper
Swartzlander, G. A., Andersen, D. R., Regan, J. J., Yin, H., & Kaplan, A. E. (1991). Spatial dark-soliton stripes and grids in self-defocusing materials. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.66.1583

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.