Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 447

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dipole interactions with random anisotropy in a frozen ferrofluid

Luo, Weili, Nagel, Sidney R., Rosenbaum, T. F., Rosensweig, R. E.·1991·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Glassy behavior (including hysteresis, irreversibility, a peak in the zero-field-cooled magnetization, and nonexponential relaxation) is observed in a quenched ferrofluid system consisting of 50-\AA{} magnetite particles. An Arrott plot, ${\mathit{M}}^{2}$ versus H/M, shows clear features of random anisotropy similar to what is found in amorphous ferromagnets. We discuss the glassy behavior in terms of both the random anisotropy and the dipole interactions, and we constrast the unusual response of our system with canonical spin glasses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.67.2721

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 447

Metadata

Authors
Luo, W., Nagel, S. R., Rosenbaum, T. F., & Rosensweig, R. E.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1991-11-04
Volume
67
Issue
19
Pages
2721-2724
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045848189
Cited by
447
References
0
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dipole interactions with random anisotropy in a frozen ferrofluid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.67.2721
The paper
Luo, W., Nagel, S. R., Rosenbaum, T. F., & Rosensweig, R. E. (1991). Dipole interactions with random anisotropy in a frozen ferrofluid. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.67.2721

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.