Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,073

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coherent destruction of tunneling

Grossmann, F., Dittrich, T., Jung, P., Hänggi, P.·1991·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The phenomenon of tunneling is investigated for a symmetric double-well potential perturbed by a monochromatic driving force. The analysis is based on a numerical treatment of the quantum map that propagates the system over one period of the external force, and of the spectrum of its eigenphases (quasienergies). The variety in the quasienergy spectrum, such as exact and avoided crossings, leads to novel forms of coherent tunneling. In particular, for specific parameter values of the driving force, we find almost complete localization of the wave packet in one of the wells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.67.516

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. F. Hund, 1927, Z. Phys., 43, 803
  2. J. L. Skinner, 1988, J. Chem. Phys., 89, 897, 10.1063/1.455213 · DOI · Paper page
  3. A. Oppenländer, 1989, Phys. Rev. Lett., 63, 1432, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.1432 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.63.1432
  4. J. Kondo, 1984, Physica (Amsterdam), 125B, 279, 10.1016/0378-4363(84)90044-5 · DOI
  5. J. Kondo, 1984, Physica (Amsterdam), 126B, 377, 10.1016/0378-4363(84)90191-8 · DOI
  6. H. Grabert, 1986, Europhys. Lett., 2, 631, 10.1209/0295-5075/2/8/010 · DOI
  7. H. Wipf, 1987, Europhys. Lett., 4, 1379, 10.1209/0295-5075/4/12/007 · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/4/12/007
  8. C. D. Tesche, 1986, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 480, 36, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb12408.x · DOI
  9. C. D. Tesche, 1990, Phys. Rev. Lett., 64, 2358, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2358 · DOI
  10. J. H. Shirley, 1965, Phys. Rev., 138, B979, 10.1103/PhysRev.138.B979 · DOI · Paper page
  11. N. L. Manakov, 1986, Phys. Rep., 141, 319, 10.1016/S0370-1573(86)80001-1 · DOI · Paper page
  12. S. Chu, 1986, Adv. Chem. Phys., 73, 739
  13. R. Blümel, 1987, Z. Phys. D, 6, 83, 10.1007/BF01384595 · DOI
  14. G. Casati, 1989, Prog. Theor. Phys. (Suppl.), 98, 286, 10.1143/PTPS.98.287 · doi:10.1143/ptps.98.287
  15. P. W. Anderson, 1978, Rev. Mod. Phys., 50, 191, 10.1103/RevModPhys.50.191 · DOI · Paper page
  16. S. Fishman, 1982, Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 509, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.509 · DOI · Paper page
  17. S. Fishman, 1984, Phys. Rev. A, 29, 1639, 10.1103/PhysRevA.29.1639 · DOI · Paper page
  18. T. Dittrich, 1991, Nonlinearity, 4, 59, 10.1088/0951-7715/4/1/006 · doi:10.1088/0951-7715/4/1/006
  19. H. P. Breuer, 1988, Z. Phys. D, 8, 349, 10.1007/BF01437101 · DOI
  20. F. Grossmann, 1990, Verh. DPG (VI), 25, 691

Cited by

See all 1,073

Metadata

Authors
Grossmann, F., Dittrich, T., Jung, P., & Hänggi, P.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1991-07-22
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
516-519
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074377861
Cited by
1,073
References
1
FWCI
17.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coherent destruction of tunneling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.67.516
The paper
Grossmann, F., Dittrich, T., Jung, P., & Hänggi, P. (1991). Coherent destruction of tunneling. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.67.516

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.