Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 852

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gluon shadowing and jet quenching in A+A collisions at √s=200 A GeV

Wang, Xin-Nian, Gyulassy, Miklos·1992·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The sensitivity of moderate ${\mathit{p}}_{\mathit{T}}$\ensuremath{\lesssim}8 GeV/c singles inclusive spectra in nuclear collisions to gluon shadowing and jet quenching is estimated using the higing Monte Carlo model. We show how the systematic study of the nuclear dependence of those spectra in p+A can be used to determine the magnitude of gluon shadowing and how the enhanced suppression in A+A would provide information on the energy-loss mechanisms in dense partonic matter.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.68.1480

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 852

Metadata

Authors
Wang, X.-N., & Gyulassy, M.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1992-03-09
Volume
68
Issue
10
Pages
1480-1483
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990178798
Cited by
852
References
24
FWCI
12.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gluon shadowing and jet quenching in A+A collisions at √s=200 A GeV. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.68.1480
The paper
Wang, X.-N., & Gyulassy, M. (1992). Gluon shadowing and jet quenching in A+A collisions at √s=200 A GeV. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.68.1480

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.