The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox for continuous variables
Abstract
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox is demonstrated experimentally for dynamical variables having a continuous spectrum. As opposed to previous work with discrete spin or polarization variables, the continuous optical amplitudes of a signal beam are inferred in turn from those of a spatially separated but strongly correlated idler beam generated by nondegenerate parametric amplification. The uncertainty product for the variances of these inferences is observed to be 0.70\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.01, which is below the limit of unity required for the demonstration of the paradox.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
On the Quantum Correction For Thermodynamic Equilibrium
Wigner, E. (1932) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.40.749 · Cited by 9,283
Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers
Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., & Roger, G. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.1804 · Cited by 3,942
Violation of Bell's Inequality and Classical Probability in a Two-Photon Correlation Experiment
Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1988) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.50 · Cited by 879
Self-citationExperimental violation of Bell’s inequality based on phase and momentum
Rarity, J. G., & Tapster, P. R. (1990) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.64.2495 · Cited by 612
Cited by
Quantum information with continuous variables
Braunstein, S. L., & van Loock, P. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.513 · Cited by 3,858
Unconditional Quantum Teleportation
Furusawa, A., Sørensen, J. L., Braunstein, S. L., Fuchs, C. A., Kimble, H. J., & Polzik, E. S. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5389.706 · Cited by 3,005
Self-citationO'Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A., & Vučković, J. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.229 · Cited by 2,388
Teleportation of Continuous Quantum Variables
Braunstein, S. L., & Kimble, H. J. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.869 · Cited by 1,766
Self-citationContinuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography
Lvovsky, A. I., & Raymer, M. G. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.299 · Cited by 1,123
Metadata
- Authors
- Ou, Z. Y., Pereira, S. F., Kimble, H. J., & Peng, K. C.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1992-06-22
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 3663-3666
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055350506
- Cited by
- 1,151
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox for continuous variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.68.3663
- The paper
- Ou, Z. Y., Pereira, S. F., Kimble, H. J., & Peng, K. C. (1992). Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox for continuous variables. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.68.3663
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
