Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,840

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Absorption of ultra-intense laser pulses

Wilks, S. C., Kruer, W. L., Tabak, M., Langdon, A. B.·1992·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We use simulations to investigate the interaction of ultra-intense laser pulses with a plasma. With an intensity greater than ${10}^{18}$ W/${\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$, these pulses have a pressure greater than ${10}^{3}$ M bar and drive the plasma relativistically. Hole boring by the light beam is a key feature of the interaction. We find substantial absorption into heated electrons with a characteristic temperature of order the pondermotive potential. Other effects include a dependence on the polarization of the incident light, strong magnetic field generation, and a period of intense instability generation in the underdense plasma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.69.1383

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,840

Metadata

Authors
Wilks, S. C., Kruer, W. L., Tabak, M., & Langdon, A. B.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1992-08-31
Volume
69
Issue
9
Pages
1383-1386
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029578527
Cited by
1,840
References
0
FWCI
12.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Absorption of ultra-intense laser pulses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.69.1383
The paper
Wilks, S. C., Kruer, W. L., Tabak, M., & Langdon, A. B. (1992). Absorption of ultra-intense laser pulses. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.69.1383

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.