Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,561

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Observation of the coupled exciton-photon mode splitting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity

Weisbuch, C., Nishioka, M., Ishikawa, A., Arakawa, Y.·1992·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The spectral response of a monolithic semiconductor quantum microcavity with quantum wells as the active medium displays mode splitting when the quantum wells and the optical cavity are in resonance. This effect can be seen as the Rabi vacuum-field splitting of the quantum-well excitons, or more classically as the normal-mode splitting of coupled oscillators, the excitons, and the electromagnetic field of the microcavity. An exciton oscillator strength of 4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}${10}^{12}$ ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}2}$ is deduced for 76-\AA{} quantum wells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.69.3314

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,561

Metadata

Authors
Weisbuch, C., Nishioka, M., Ishikawa, A., & Arakawa, Y.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1992-12-07
Volume
69
Issue
23
Pages
3314-3317
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967394964
Cited by
2,561
References
0
FWCI
19.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observation of the coupled exciton-photon mode splitting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.69.3314
The paper
Weisbuch, C., Nishioka, M., Ishikawa, A., & Arakawa, Y. (1992). Observation of the coupled exciton-photon mode splitting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.69.3314

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.