Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 472

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Structural Properties of a Carbon-Nanotube Crystal

Tersoff, J., Ruoff, R. S.·1994·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes of uniform size may soon be available in macroscopic quantities. Here we examine the ordered condensed phase of these tubes. As the tube diameter varies, the structural properties show a clear transition between two regimes with qualitatively different behavior. Tubes 10 \AA{} and less in diameter behave as rigid cylinders. For diameters over 25 \AA{}, the tubes flatten against each other under the van der Waals attraction, forming a honeycomb structure. This structure exhibits an anomalous rigidity, which does not decrease as expected with increasing tube diameter. Based on reported tube sizes, both regimes should be experimentally accessible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.73.676

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 472

Metadata

Authors
Tersoff, J., & Ruoff, R. S.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1994-08-01
Volume
73
Issue
5
Pages
676-679
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969589481
Cited by
472
References
0
FWCI
10.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural Properties of a Carbon-Nanotube Crystal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.73.676
The paper
Tersoff, J., & Ruoff, R. S. (1994). Structural Properties of a Carbon-Nanotube Crystal. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.73.676

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.