Cited by 151Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchRelativity and Gravitational Theory

New Limits on Local Lorentz Invariance from Hg and Cs Magnetometers

Berglund, C. J., Hunter, L. R., Krause, Jr., D., Prigge, E. O., Ronfeldt, M. S., Lamoreaux, S. K.·1995·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The relative frequency of Hg and Cs mgnetometers is monitored as a function of the orientation of the applied magnetic field with respect to the fixed stars. The observed stability of the relative frequency limits electron and nucleon local Lorentz invariance violating effects to less than 200 \ensuremath{\mu}Hz and 110 nHz, respectively. These results represent an improvement over the best published results by an order of magnitude for electron effects and by a factor of 240 for nuclear effects. The result also sets an upper limit of 200 eV on the Fermi level of a degenerate remnant neutrino background.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.75.1879

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A stronger bound of ΛNC > 5 × 10^14 GeV on the non-commutativity scale can be derived from clock comparison experiments with Cs/Hg magnetometers.

    “A stronger bound of ΛNC > 5 × 1014 GeV [218] on the non-commutativity scale can be derived from clock comparison experiments with Cs/Hg magnetometers [46] (see Section 5.2).”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [46]

  • Similar proton bounds have been estimated from the Berglund et al. experiment using the Schmidt model for nuclear structure, in which an individual nucleon is assumed to carry the entire nuclear angular momentum.

    “Similar bounds have been estimated [175] from the experiment of Berglund et al. [46] using the Schmidt model [251] for nuclear structure, where an individual nucleon is assumed to carry the entire nuclear angular momentum.”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [46]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 151

Authors
Berglund, C. J., Hunter, L. R., Krause, Jr., Prigge, E. O., Ronfeldt, M. S., & Lamoreaux, S. K.
Affiliations
Amherst College (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1995-09-04
Volume
75
Issue
10
Pages
1879-1882
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1988023131
Cited by
151
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
local Lorentz invariance, Lorentz violation, cesium magnetometer, relative frequency stability, magnetic field orientation, fixed stars

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review