Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 756

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Metallization of Fluid Molecular Hydrogen at 140 GPa (1.4 Mbar)

Weir, S. T., Mitchell, A. C., Nellis, W. J.·1996·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Electrical resistivities were measured for liquid ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}$ and ${\mathrm{D}}_{2}$ shock compressed to pressures of 93--180 GPa (0.93--1.8 Mbar). Calculated densities and temperatures were in the range 0.28--0.36 mol/c${\mathrm{m}}^{3}$ and 2200--4400 K. Resistivity decreases almost 4 orders of magnitude from 93 to 140 GPa and is essentially constant at a value typical of a liquid metal from 140 to 180 GPa. The data are interpreted in terms of a continuous transition from a semiconducting to metallic diatomic fluid at 140 GPa and 3000 K.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.76.1860

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 756

Metadata

Authors
Weir, S. T., Mitchell, A. C., & Nellis, W. J.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1996-03-11
Volume
76
Issue
11
Pages
1860-1863
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2037260677
Cited by
756
References
0
FWCI
45.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metallization of Fluid Molecular Hydrogen at 140 GPa (1.4 Mbar). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.76.1860
The paper
Weir, S. T., Mitchell, A. C., & Nellis, W. J. (1996). Metallization of Fluid Molecular Hydrogen at 140 GPa (1.4 Mbar). Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.76.1860

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.