Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 795

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Is There a Hot Electroweak Phase Transition atmH≳mW?

Open access
Kajantie, K., Laine, M., Rummukainen, K., Shaposhnikov, M.·1996·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We provide nonperturbative evidence for the fact that there is no hot first or second order electroweak phase transition at large Higgs masses, ${m}_{H}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}95$, 120, and 180 GeV. This means that the line of first order phase transitions separating the symmetric and broken phases at small ${m}_{H}$ has an end point ${m}_{H,c}$. In the minimal standard electroweak theory $70<{m}_{H,c}<95\mathrm{GeV}$ and most likely ${m}_{H,c}\ensuremath{\approx}80\mathrm{GeV}$. If the electroweak theory is weakly coupled and the Higgs boson is found to be heavier than the critical value (which depends on the theory in question), cosmological remnants from the electroweak epoch are improbable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.77.2887

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. D. A. Kirzhnits, 1976, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 101, 195, 10.1016/0003-4916(76)90279-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. B. Bunk, 1993, Nucl. Phys., B403, 453, 10.1016/0550-3213(93)90043-O · DOI
  3. K. Kajantie, 1993, Nucl. Phys., B407, 356, 10.1016/0550-3213(93)90062-T · DOI
  4. F. Csikor, 1994, Phys. Lett. B, 334, 405, 10.1016/0370-2693(94)90706-4 · DOI
  5. 1995, Nucl. Phys., B439, 147
  6. E.-M. Ilgenfritz, 1995, Phys. Lett. B, 356, 561, 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00856-G · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)00856-g
  7. K. Farakos, 1994, Nucl. Phys., B425, 67, 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90173-2 · DOI · Paper page
  8. K. Kajantie, 1996, Nucl. Phys., B458, 90, 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00549-8 · DOI · Paper page
  9. T. Banks, 1979, Nucl. Phys., B160, 349, 10.1016/0550-3213(79)90064-6 · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90064-6
  10. E. Fradkin, 1979, Phys. Rev. D, 19, 3682, 10.1103/PhysRevD.19.3682 · DOI · Paper page
  11. P. H. Damgaard, 1987, Nucl. Phys., B294, 253, 10.1016/0550-3213(87)90582-7 · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90582-7
  12. H. G. Evertz, 1987, Nucl. Phys., B285, 229, 10.1016/0550-3213(87)90336-1 · DOI
  13. V. A. Rubakov, 1996, Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 166, 493, 10.3367/UFNr.0166.199605d.0493 · DOI · Paper page
  14. P. Ginsparg, 1980, Nucl. Phys., B170, 388, 10.1016/0550-3213(80)90418-6 · DOI · Paper page
  15. P. Arnold, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 49, 3003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.3003 · DOI
  16. W. Buchmüller, 1995, Nucl. Phys., B443, 47, 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00124-B · DOI
  17. M. N. Barber, 1983, Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena,

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kajantie, K., Laine, M., Rummukainen, K., & Shaposhnikov, M.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1996-09-30
Volume
77
Issue
14
Pages
2887-2890
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2121706353
Cited by
795
References
0
FWCI
18.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.