The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Is There a Hot Electroweak Phase Transition atmH≳mW?
Open accessAbstract
We provide nonperturbative evidence for the fact that there is no hot first or second order electroweak phase transition at large Higgs masses, ${m}_{H}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}95$, 120, and 180 GeV. This means that the line of first order phase transitions separating the symmetric and broken phases at small ${m}_{H}$ has an end point ${m}_{H,c}$. In the minimal standard electroweak theory $70<{m}_{H,c}<95\mathrm{GeV}$ and most likely ${m}_{H,c}\ensuremath{\approx}80\mathrm{GeV}$. If the electroweak theory is weakly coupled and the Higgs boson is found to be heavier than the critical value (which depends on the theory in question), cosmological remnants from the electroweak epoch are improbable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- D. A. Kirzhnits, 1976, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 101, 195, 10.1016/0003-4916(76)90279-7 · DOI · Paper page
- B. Bunk, 1993, Nucl. Phys., B403, 453, 10.1016/0550-3213(93)90043-O · DOI
- K. Kajantie, 1993, Nucl. Phys., B407, 356, 10.1016/0550-3213(93)90062-T · DOI
- F. Csikor, 1994, Phys. Lett. B, 334, 405, 10.1016/0370-2693(94)90706-4 · DOI
- 1995, Nucl. Phys., B439, 147
- E.-M. Ilgenfritz, 1995, Phys. Lett. B, 356, 561, 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00856-G · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)00856-g
- K. Farakos, 1994, Nucl. Phys., B425, 67, 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90173-2 · DOI · Paper page
- K. Kajantie, 1996, Nucl. Phys., B458, 90, 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00549-8 · DOI · Paper page
- T. Banks, 1979, Nucl. Phys., B160, 349, 10.1016/0550-3213(79)90064-6 · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90064-6
- E. Fradkin, 1979, Phys. Rev. D, 19, 3682, 10.1103/PhysRevD.19.3682 · DOI · Paper page
- P. H. Damgaard, 1987, Nucl. Phys., B294, 253, 10.1016/0550-3213(87)90582-7 · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90582-7
- H. G. Evertz, 1987, Nucl. Phys., B285, 229, 10.1016/0550-3213(87)90336-1 · DOI
- V. A. Rubakov, 1996, Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 166, 493, 10.3367/UFNr.0166.199605d.0493 · DOI · Paper page
- P. Ginsparg, 1980, Nucl. Phys., B170, 388, 10.1016/0550-3213(80)90418-6 · DOI · Paper page
- P. Arnold, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 49, 3003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.3003 · DOI
- W. Buchmüller, 1995, Nucl. Phys., B443, 47, 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00124-B · DOI
- M. N. Barber, 1983, Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena,
Cited by
Non-perturbative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics
Berges, J., Tetradis, N., & Wetterich, C. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00098-9 · Cited by 1,548
Trodden, M. (1999) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.71.1463 · Cited by 521
Phase Transitions in the Early and Present Universe
Boyanovsky, D., de Vega, H. J., & Schwarz, D. J. (2006) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.56.080805.140539 · Cited by 146
Csikor, F., Fodor, Z., Hegedüs, P., Jakovác, A., Katz, S. D., & Piróth, A. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.932 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Kajantie, K., Laine, M., Rummukainen, K., & Shaposhnikov, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1996-09-30
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2887-2890
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2121706353
- Cited by
- 795
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.