Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why Effective Medium Theory Fails in Granular Materials

Open access
Makse, Hernán A., Gland, Nicolas, Johnson, David L., Schwartz, Lawrence M.·1999·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Experimentally it is known that the bulk modulus $K$ and shear modulus $\ensuremath{\mu}$ of a granular assembly of elastic spheres increase with pressure $p$ faster than the ${p}^{1/3}$ law predicted by effective medium theory (EMT) based on Hertz-Mindlin contact forces. To understand the origin of these discrepancies, we perform numerical simulations of granular aggregates under compression. We show that EMT can describe the moduli pressure dependence if one includes the increasing number of grain-grain contacts with $p$. Most important, the affine assumption (which underlies EMT), is found to be valid for $K(p)$ but breaks down seriously for $\ensuremath{\mu}(p)$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.83.5070

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Makse, H. A., Gland, N., Johnson, D. L., & Schwartz, L. M.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1999-12-13
Volume
83
Issue
24
Pages
5070-5073
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1965474275
Cited by
297
References
6
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Effective Medium Theory Fails in Granular Materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.83.5070
The paper
Makse, H. A., Gland, N., Johnson, D. L., & Schwartz, L. M. (1999). Why Effective Medium Theory Fails in Granular Materials. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.83.5070

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.