Cited by 37Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Consistent Canonical Quantization of General Relativity in the Space of Vassiliev Invariants

Open access
Di Bartolo, Cayetano, Gambini, Rodolfo, Griego, Jorge, Pullin, Jorge·2000·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We present a quantization of the Hamiltonian and diffeomorphism constraint of canonical quantum gravity in the spin network representation. The novelty consists in considering a space of wave functions based on the Vassiliev invariants. The constraints are finite, well defined, and reproduce at the level of quantum commutators the Poisson algebra of constraints of the classical theory. A similar construction can be carried out in 2+1 dimensions leading to the correct quantum theory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.84.2314

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Regularization choices for the scalar constraint have to be made and the result is not unique.

    “Regularization choices have to be made and the result is not unique.”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [136]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]R. Gambini, J. Pullin, 'Loops, knots, gauge theories and quantum gravity', Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Bartolo, C., Gambini, R., Griego, J., & Pullin, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2000-03-13
Volume
84
Issue
11
Pages
2314-2317
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2050063181
Cited by
37
References
3
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
canonical quantum gravity, Vassiliev invariants, spin networks, Hamiltonian constraint, diffeomorphism constraint, constraint algebra, wave functions, three-dimensional gravity, loop quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review