Cited by 127Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

No-Signaling Condition and Quantum Dynamics

Open access
Simon, Christoph, Bužek, Vladimír, Gisin, Nicolas·2001·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We show that the basic dynamical rules of quantum physics can be derived from its static properties and the condition that superluminal communication is forbidden. More precisely, the fact that the dynamics has to be described by linear completely positive maps on density matrices is derived from the following assumptions: (1) physical states are described by rays in a Hilbert space, (2) probabilities for measurement outcomes at any given time are calculated according to the usual trace rule, and (3) superluminal communication is excluded. This result also constrains possible nonlinear modifications of quantum physics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.87.170405

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The map from black hole evaporation must be linear, for otherwise it would induce troubles with superluminal communication.

    “The map must be linear, for otherwise it would induce troubles with superluminal communication [59,60].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simon, C., Bužek, V., & Gisin, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2001-10-08
Volume
87
Issue
17
Pages
170405-170405
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1970952443
Cited by
127
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
superluminal communication, quantum dynamics, completely positive maps, density matrix, quantum mechanics derivation, Hilbert spaces, measurement probabilities, nonlinear quantum mechanics, quantum foundations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review