Cited by 200Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Maximal Violation of Bell’s Inequalities for Continuous Variable Systems

Open access
Chen, Zeng-Bing, Pan, Jian-Wei, Hou, Guang, Zhang, Yong-De·2002·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We generalize Bell's inequalities to biparty systems with continuous quantum variables. This is achieved by introducing the Bell operator in perfect analogy to the usual spin- 1/2 systems. It is then demonstrated that two-mode squeezed vacuum states display quantum nonlocality by using the generalized Bell operator. In particular, the original Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states, which are the limiting case of the two-mode squeezed vacuum states, can maximally violate Bell's inequality due to Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt. The experimental aspect of our scheme is briefly considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.88.040406

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For continuous variables like position and momentum, these operators may include parity and two other variables that test even and odd wavefunctions.

    “For continuous variables like position and momentum, these operators may include parity and two other variables that test even and odd wavefunctions [34][35][36][37][38].”

    From Exactly solvable 2D model for photon propagation in curved space: loss of interference and Bell inequality violation (2022) · cites this paper as [36]

    On p. 2, the paper defines three pseudospin operators for continuous-variable light fields: one is related to photon-number parity, and the others act in photon parity space. It describes the latter as parity-flip operators, however, not as variables that test even and odd wavefunctions. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [2]J. S. Bell, Physics (Long Island) 1, 195 (1964).
  2. [3]J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony and R. A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
  3. [5]D. Bohm, Quantum Theory (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1951).
  4. [6]M. D. Reid and P. D. Drummond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2731 (1988); M. D. Reid, Phys. Rev. A 40, 913 (1989).
  5. [7]D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994).
  6. [8]Z. Y. Ou, S. F. Pereira, H. J. Kimble, and K. C. Peng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3663 (1992).
  7. [10]D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, and A. Zeilinger (eds), The Physics of Quantum Information (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000).
  8. [12]L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A 49, 1473 (1994); S. L. Braunstein and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 869 (1998); A. Furusawa et al ., Science 282, 706 (1998).
  9. [13]S. L. Braunstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4084 (1998); S. Lloyd and J.-J. E. Slotine, ibid . 80, 4088 (1998); S. L. Braunstein, Nature (London) 394, 47 (1998).
  10. [14]S. Lloyd and S. L. Braunstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1784 (1999).
  11. [15]L.-M. Duan et al ., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4002 (2000).
  12. [16]N. J. Cerf, A. Ipe, and X. Rottenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1754 (2000).
  13. [18]K. Banaszek and K. W´ odkiewicz, Phys. Rev. A 58 , 4345 (1998); Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2009 (1999); Acta Phys. Slov. 49 , 491 (1999).
  14. [19]E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932).
  15. [20]B. Yurke and D. Stoler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4941 (1997).
  16. [21]A. Kuzmich, I. A. Walmsley, and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1349 (2000).
  17. [22]P. Grangier, M. J. Potasek, and B. Yurke, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3132 (1988).
  18. [23]H. Jeong, J. Lee, and M. S. Kim, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052101 (2000).
  19. [24]S. L. Braunstein, A. Mann, and M. Revzen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3259 (1992).
  20. [25]L. J. Landau, Phys. Lett. A 120, 54 (1987).
  21. [30]C. H. Bennett et al ., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993); D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Z.-B., Pan, J.-W., Hou, G., & Zhang, Y.-D.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2002-01-14
Volume
88
Issue
4
Pages
040406-040406
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2100013267
Cited by
200
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
Bell inequalities, continuous-variable quantum systems, two-mode squeezed vacuum, quantum nonlocality, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states, CHSH inequality violation, bipartite quantum systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review