The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intrinsic Profiles beyond the Capillary Wave Theory: A Monte Carlo Study
Abstract
We develop and test an operational definition of the intrinsic surface for liquid-vapor interfaces. The application to the microscopic configurations along Monte Carlo computer simulations gives the statistical properties of the intrinsic surfaces and the intrinsic density profiles for simple fluid models. The results open a framework of quantitative description to close the gap between the mesoscopic capillary wave theory and the sharpest level of resolution for the intrinsic density distribution, relative to the first atomic layer in the liquid surface, as done in the interpretation of experimental x-ray reflectivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Instantaneous Liquid Interfaces
Willard, A. P., & Chandler, D. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp909219k · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Chacón, E., & Tarazona, P.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2003-10-16
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 166103-166103
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2078046139
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrinsic Profiles beyond the Capillary Wave Theory: A Monte Carlo Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.91.166103
- The paper
- Chacón, E., & Tarazona, P. (2003). Intrinsic Profiles beyond the Capillary Wave Theory: A Monte Carlo Study. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.91.166103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
