Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 730

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Superconductivity without Inversion Symmetry: MnSi versusCePt3Si

Open access
Frigeri, P. A., Agterberg, D. F., Koga, A., Sigrist, M.·2004·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Superconductivity in materials without spatial inversion symmetry is studied. We show that in contrast to common belief, spin-triplet pairing is not entirely excluded in such systems. Moreover, paramagnetic limiting is analyzed for both spin-singlet and -triplet pairing. The lack of inversion symmetry reduces the effect of the paramagnetic limiting for spin-singlet pairing. These results are applied to MnSi and CePt3Si.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.92.097001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 730

Metadata

Authors
Frigeri, P. A., Agterberg, D. F., Koga, A., & Sigrist, M.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2004-03-03
Volume
92
Issue
9
Pages
097001-097001
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1642067022
Cited by
730
References
2
FWCI
26.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Superconductivity without Inversion Symmetry: MnSi versusCePt3Si. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.92.097001
The paper
Frigeri, P. A., Agterberg, D. F., Koga, A., & Sigrist, M. (2004). Superconductivity without Inversion Symmetry: MnSi versusCePt3Si. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.92.097001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.