The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What Do We (Not) Know Theoretically about Solar Neutrino Fluxes?
Open accessAbstract
Solar model predictions of $^{8}\mathrm{B}$ and $p\mathrm{\text{\ensuremath{-}}}p$ neutrinos agree with the experimentally determined fluxes (including oscillations): $\ensuremath{\varphi}(pp{)}_{\mathrm{measured}}=(1.02\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}00.02\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.01)\ensuremath{\varphi}(pp{)}_{\mathrm{theory}}$ and $\ensuremath{\varphi}(^{8}\mathrm{B}{)}_{\mathrm{measured}}=(0.88\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.04\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.23)\ensuremath{\varphi}(^{8}\mathrm{B}{)}_{\mathrm{theory}}$, $1\ensuremath{\sigma}$ experimental and theoretical uncertainties, respectively. We use improved input data for nuclear fusion reactions, the equation of state, and the chemical composition of the Sun. The solar composition is the dominant uncertainty in calculating the $^{8}\mathrm{B}$ and CNO neutrino fluxes; the cross section for the $^{3}\mathrm{He}(^{4}\mathrm{He},\ensuremath{\gamma})^{7}\mathrm{Be}$ reaction is the most important uncertainty for the calculated $^{7}\mathrm{Be}$ neutrino flux.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolution of Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars
Herwig, F. (2005) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150600 · Cited by 1,051
Complete results for five years of GNO solar neutrino observations
Altmann, M., Balata, M., Belli, P., Bellotti, E., Bernabei, R., Burkert, E., Cattadori, C., Cerulli, R., Chiarini, M., Cribier, M., et al. (2005) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.04.068 · Cited by 408
Solar neutrino results in Super-Kamiokande-III
Abe, K., Hayato, Y., Iida, T., Ikeda, M., Ishihara, C., Iyogi, K., Kameda, J., Kobayashi, K., Koshio, Y., Kozuma, Y., et al. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.052010 · Cited by 398
Global analysis of three-flavor neutrino masses and mixings
Fogli, G. L., Lisi, E., Marrone, A., & Palazzo, A. (2006) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2005.08.002 · Cited by 386
Recent developments in no-core shell-model calculations
Navrátil, P., Quaglioni, S., Stetcu, I., & Barrett, B. R. (2009) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/36/8/083101 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Bahcall, J. N., & Pinsonneault, M. H.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2004-03-25
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 121301-121301
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2036565186
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Do We (Not) Know Theoretically about Solar Neutrino Fluxes? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.92.121301
- The paper
- Bahcall, J. N., & Pinsonneault, M. H. (2004). What Do We (Not) Know Theoretically about Solar Neutrino Fluxes? Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.92.121301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.