The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Non-Gaussian Statistics from Individual Pulses of Squeezed Light
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is difficult to produce the superposition states required as resources in squeezed or coherent state schemes.
“The downside is that it is difficult to produce the superposition states that are required as resources in such schemes, although considerable theoretical and experimental progress has been made recently (Lund et al. 2004;Wenger et al. 2004).”
From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Wenger et al. 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication
Briegel, H.-J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5932 · Cited by 3,481
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.057902 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature01289 · DOI
- F. Grosshans, 2003, Quantum Inf. Comput., 3, 535, 10.26421/QIC3.s-6 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.047905 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.137903 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.032316 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.062320 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2566 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.44.2013 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.050402 · DOI
- U. Leonhardt, 1997, Measuring the Quantum State of Light
- F. Grosshans, 2001, Eur. Phys. J. D, 14, 119, 10.1007/s100530170243 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10053-002-8826-z · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Metadata
- Authors
- Wenger, J., Tualle-Brouri, R., & Grangier, P.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2004-04-13
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 15
- ISSN
- 0031-9007
- 1079-7114
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
