Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 701

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Voter Model on Heterogeneous Graphs

Open access
Sood, V., Redner, S.·2005·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We study the voter model on heterogeneous graphs. We exploit the nonconservation of the magnetization to characterize how consensus is reached. For a network of $N$ nodes with an arbitrary but uncorrelated degree distribution, the mean time to reach consensus ${T}_{N}$ scales as $N{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{1}^{2}/{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{2}$, where ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{k}$ is the $k$th moment of the degree distribution. For a power-law degree distribution ${n}_{k}\ensuremath{\sim}{k}^{\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\nu}}$, ${T}_{N}$ thus scales as $N$ for $\ensuremath{\nu}>3$, as $N/\mathrm{ln}N$ for $\ensuremath{\nu}=3$, as ${N}^{(2\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{-}4)/(\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{-}1)}$ for $2<\ensuremath{\nu}<3$, as $(\mathrm{ln}N{)}^{2}$ for $\ensuremath{\nu}=2$, and as $\mathcal{O}(1)$ for $\ensuremath{\nu}<2$. These results agree with simulation data for networks with both uncorrelated and correlated node degrees.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.94.178701

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 701

Metadata

Authors
Sood, V., & Redner, S.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2005-05-04
Volume
94
Issue
17
Pages
178701-178701
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2150041461
Cited by
701
References
1
FWCI
14.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Voter Model on Heterogeneous Graphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.94.178701
The paper
Sood, V., & Redner, S. (2005). Voter Model on Heterogeneous Graphs. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.94.178701

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.