The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Voter Model on Heterogeneous Graphs
Open accessAbstract
We study the voter model on heterogeneous graphs. We exploit the nonconservation of the magnetization to characterize how consensus is reached. For a network of $N$ nodes with an arbitrary but uncorrelated degree distribution, the mean time to reach consensus ${T}_{N}$ scales as $N{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{1}^{2}/{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{2}$, where ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{k}$ is the $k$th moment of the degree distribution. For a power-law degree distribution ${n}_{k}\ensuremath{\sim}{k}^{\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\nu}}$, ${T}_{N}$ thus scales as $N$ for $\ensuremath{\nu}>3$, as $N/\mathrm{ln}N$ for $\ensuremath{\nu}=3$, as ${N}^{(2\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{-}4)/(\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{-}1)}$ for $2<\ensuremath{\nu}<3$, as $(\mathrm{ln}N{)}^{2}$ for $\ensuremath{\nu}=2$, and as $\mathcal{O}(1)$ for $\ensuremath{\nu}<2$. These results agree with simulation data for networks with both uncorrelated and correlated node degrees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Cited by
Statistical physics of social dynamics
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., & Loreto, V. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.591 · Cited by 4,119
The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks
Boccaletti, S., Bianconi, G., Criado, R., del Genio, C. I., Gómez-Gardeñes, J., Romance, M., Sendiña-Nadal, I., Wang, Z., & Zanin, M. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.07.001 · Cited by 3,125
Critical phenomena in complex networks
Dorogovtsev, S. N., Goltsev, A. V., & Mendes, J. F. F. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.1275 · Cited by 2,220
Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies
Shalizi, C. R., & Thomas, A. C. (2011) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124111404820 · Cited by 994
“Probabilistically, the vector Y (t) is a Markov chain, specifically a variant of the “voter model” of statistical mechanics on a graph (Liggett, 1985; Sood and Redner, 2005); the minor addition of low-frequency noise (doing the opposite of the selected neighbor) keeps the homogeneous configurations…”
BackgroundInfluentialNonequilibrium phase transition in the coevolution of networks and opinions
Holme, P., & Newman, M. E. J. (2006) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.74.056108 · Cited by 621
Metadata
- Authors
- Sood, V., & Redner, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-05-04
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 178701-178701
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2150041461
- Cited by
- 701
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Voter Model on Heterogeneous Graphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.94.178701
- The paper
- Sood, V., & Redner, S. (2005). Voter Model on Heterogeneous Graphs. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.94.178701
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.