Cited by 34Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

Processor Core Model for Quantum Computing

Open access
Yung, Man-Hong, Benjamin, Simon C., Bose, Sougato·2006·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We describe an architecture based on a processing "core," where multiple qubits interact perpetually, and a separate "store," where qubits exist in isolation. Computation consists of single qubit operations, swaps between the store and the core, and free evolution of the core. This enables computation using physical systems where the entangling interactions are "always on." Alternatively, for switchable systems, our model constitutes a prescription for optimizing many-qubit gates. We discuss implementations of the quantum Fourier transform, Hamiltonian simulation, and quantum error correction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.96.220501

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Imperfect QST over a uniform spin chain is impossible for long chains.

    “Imperfect QST [8, 9] over a uniform spin chain was studied numerically, showing that perfect state transfer is impossible for long chains.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 34

Authors
Yung, M.-H., Benjamin, S. C., & Bose, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2006-06-05
Volume
96
Issue
22
Pages
220501-220501
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1993696486
Cited by
34
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
quantum processor architecture, single-qubit operations, quantum Fourier transform, Hamiltonian simulation, quantum error correction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review