CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 417Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum chaos and dynamical systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Faster than Hermitian Quantum Mechanics

Open access
Bender, Carl M., Brody, Dorje C., Jones, Hugh F., Meister, Bernhard K.·2007·Physical Review Letters
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.98.040403
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Given an initial quantum state $|{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{I}⟩$ and a final quantum state $|{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{F}⟩$, there exist Hamiltonians $H$ under which $|{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{I}⟩$ evolves into $|{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{F}⟩$. Consider the following quantum brachistochrone problem: subject to the constraint that the difference between the largest and smallest eigenvalues of $H$ is held fixed, which $H$ achieves this transformation in the least time $\ensuremath{\tau}$? For Hermitian Hamiltonians $\ensuremath{\tau}$ has a nonzero lower bound. However, among non-Hermitian $\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}$-symmetric Hamiltonians satisfying the same energy constraint, $\ensuremath{\tau}$ can be made arbitrarily small without violating the time-energy uncertainty principle. This is because for such Hamiltonians the path from $|{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{I}⟩$ to $|{\ensuremath{\psi}}_{F}⟩$ can be made short. The mechanism described here is similar to that in general relativity in which the distance between two space-time points can be made small if they are connected by a wormhole. This result may have applications in quantum computing.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.98.040403

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 20 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 411

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bender, C. M., Brody, D. C., Jones, H. F., & Meister, B. K.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Renmin University of China (CN)
ORCID
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2007-01-24
Volume
98
Issue
4
Pages
040403-040403
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.98.040403
OpenAlex
W2010599738
Cited by
417
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 24
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
Keywords
quantum brachistochrone, non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, PT-symmetric Hamiltonians, time-energy uncertainty relation, quantum state evolution, energy constraints, Hamiltonian spectrum, quantum computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review