Cited by 120Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

Measurements as a roadblock to near-term practical quantum advantage in chemistry: resource analysis

Open access
Gonthier, Jérôme F., Radin, Maxwell D., Buda, Corneliu, Doskocil, Eric J., Abuan, Clena M., Romero, Jhonathan·2022·Physical Review Research

Abstract

Recent advances in quantum computing devices have brought attention to hybrid quantum-classical algorithms like the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) as a potential route to practical quantum advantage in chemistry. However, it is not yet clear whether such algorithms, even in the absence of device error, could actually achieve quantum advantage for systems of practical interest. We have performed an exhaustive analysis to estimate the number of qubits and number of measurements required to compute the combustion energies of small organic molecules and related systems to within chemical accuracy of experimental values using the VQE. We consider several key modern improvements to the VQE, including low-rank factorizations of the Hamiltonian. Our results indicate that, although these techniques are useful, they will not be sufficient to achieve practical quantum computational advantage for our molecular set, or for similar molecules. This suggests that novel approaches to operator estimation leveraging quantum coherence, such as enhanced likelihood functions, may be required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevresearch.4.033154

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As the molecule size increases, VQE requires a larger number of sub cycles for Hamiltonian averaging, projecting to unfeasibly long runtime for systems of practical importance.

    “as the molecule size increases, VQE requires a larger number of sub cycles for Hamiltonian averaging (because of more terms in the Hamiltonian), projecting to unfeasibly long runtime for systems of practical importance [90, 102, 106, 107]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 120

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Feasibility and timeframes of quantum computing, in Quantum Computing: Progress and Prospects, edited by E. Grumbling and M. Horowitz (National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2019), Chap. 7, pp. 156-189.
  2. V. E. Elfving, B. W. Broer, M. Webber, J. Gavartin, M. D. Halls, K. P. Lorton, and A. Bochevarov, How will quantum comput- ers provide an industrially relevant computational advantage in quantum chemistry? arXiv:2009.12472v1. · arXiv
  3. Y. Mochizuki, K. Okuwaki, T. Kato, and Y. Minato, Reduction of orbital space for molecular orbital calculations with quantum computation simulator for educations, chemrxiv.9863810.v1. · DOI
  4. P. Gokhale, O. Angiuli, Y. Ding, K. Gui, T. Tomesh, M. Suchara, M. Martonosi, and F. T. Chong, Minimizing state preparations in variational quantum eigensolver by partitioning into commuting families, arXiv:1907.13623. · arXiv
  5. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033154 for detailed quantum chemistry methods, additional classical benchmark data, and additional quantum resources investigations.
  6. Y. Kawashima, E. Lloyd, M. P. Coons, Y. Nam, S. Matsuura, A. J. Garza, S. Johri, L. Huntington, V. Senicourt, A. O. Maksymov, J. H. V. Nguyen, J. Kim, N. Alidoust, A. Zaribafiyan, and T. Yamazaki, Efficient and accurate electronic structure simulation demonstrated on a trapped-ion quantum computer, arXiv:2102.07045. · arXiv
  7. R. S. Smith, M. J. Curtis, and W. J. Zeng, A practical quantum instruction set architecture, arXiv:1608.03355. · arXiv
  8. T.-C. Yen, A. Ganeshram, and A. F. Izmaylov, Determinis- tic improvements of quantum measurements with grouping of compatible operators, non-local transformations, and covari- ance estimates, arXiv:2201:01471.
  9. M. Kohda, R. Imai, K. Kanno, K. Mitarai, W. Mizukami, and Y. O. Nakagawa, Quantum expectation value estimation by computational basis sampling, arXiv:2112.07416. · arXiv

Authors
Gonthier, J. F., Radin, M. D., Buda, C., Doskocil, E. J., Abuan, C. M., & Romero, J.
Affiliations
  • Zapata (United States) (US)
  • BP (United States) (US)
Venue
Physical Review Research
Published
2022-08-26
Volume
4
Issue
3
ISSN
2643-1564 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293162591
Cited by
120
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 9
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Zapata Computing
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
quantum advantage, variational quantum eigensolver, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, combustion energy, organic compounds, number of measurements, qubit requirements, chemical accuracy, quantum coherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review