The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fine-tuning neural network quantum states
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Recent progress in the design and optimization of neural-network quantum states (NQSs) has made them an effective method to investigate ground-state properties of quantum many-body systems. In contrast to the standard approach of training a separate NQS from scratch at every point of the phase diagram, we demonstrate that the optimization of a NQS at a highly expressive point of the phase diagram (i.e., close to a phase transition) yields features that can be reused to accurately describe a wide region across the transition. We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach on different systems in one and two dimensions by initially pretraining a NQS at a given point of the phase diagram, followed by fine-tuning only the output layer for all other points. Notably, the computational cost of the fine-tuning step is very low compared to the pretraining stage. We argue that the reduced cost of this paradigm has significant potential to advance the exploration of strongly correlated systems using NQS, mirroring the success of fine-tuning in machine learning and natural language processing. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calculations
Fishman, M., White, S., & Stoudenmire, E. M. (2022) · SciPost Physics Codebases · doi:10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.4 · Cited by 1,084
Marshall, W. (1955) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1955.0200 · Cited by 444
NetKet 3: Machine Learning Toolbox for Many-Body Quantum Systems
Vicentini, F., Hofmann, D., Szabó, A., Wu, D., Roth, C., Giuliani, C., Pescia, G., Nys, J., Vargas-Calderón, V., Astrakhantsev, N., et al. (2022) · SciPost Physics Codebases · doi:10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.7 · Cited by 135
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- A. Vaswani, 2017, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
- A. Radford, 2019, OpenAI blog, 1, 9
- T. Brown, 2020, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
- A. Dosovitskiy, 2021, International Conference on Learning Representations
- 10.1126/science.aag2302 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.226401 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.031034 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2122059119 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.054410 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42005-024-01678-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033429 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.023138 · DOI
- F. Becca, 2017, Quantum Monte Carlo Approaches for Correlated Systems, 10.1017/9781316417041 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s42005-024-01732-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-024-45172-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/s43588-023-00578-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42005-024-01584-y · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.090501 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013216 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.236401 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023057 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.241103 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41567-024-02566-1 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2863 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.R9612 · DOI
- C. Lacroix, 2011, Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism: Materials, Experiments, Theory, 10.1007/978-3-642-10589-0 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.212402 · DOI
- 10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.5.166 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.11446 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.11678 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.060402 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.014417 · DOI
- 10.1088/0256-307X/39/7/077502 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.027201 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-023-44216-9 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011040 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys4037 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-024-45014-7 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.100503 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.046501 · DOI
- R. Novak, 2022, Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning
Metadata
- Authors
- Rende, R., Goldt, S., Becca, F., & Viteritti, L. L.
- Affiliations
- Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT)
- University of Trieste (IT)
- Venue
- Physical Review Research
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2024-12-16
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2643-1564 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4405444162
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- SDL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- CINECA
- ISCRA
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
- Keywords
- neural quantum states, fine-tuning, pre-training, phase transitions, quantum many-body systems, ground-state properties, strongly correlated systems, computational complexity reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review