Cited by 10Quantum many-body systemsQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitecturePhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fine-tuning neural network quantum states

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Recent progress in the design and optimization of neural-network quantum states (NQSs) has made them an effective method to investigate ground-state properties of quantum many-body systems. In contrast to the standard approach of training a separate NQS from scratch at every point of the phase diagram, we demonstrate that the optimization of a NQS at a highly expressive point of the phase diagram (i.e., close to a phase transition) yields features that can be reused to accurately describe a wide region across the transition. We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach on different systems in one and two dimensions by initially pretraining a NQS at a given point of the phase diagram, followed by fine-tuning only the output layer for all other points. Notably, the computational cost of the fine-tuning step is very low compared to the pretraining stage. We argue that the reduced cost of this paradigm has significant potential to advance the exploration of strongly correlated systems using NQS, mirroring the success of fine-tuning in machine learning and natural language processing. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043280

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. A. Vaswani, 2017, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  2. A. Radford, 2019, OpenAI blog, 1, 9
  3. T. Brown, 2020, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  4. A. Dosovitskiy, 2021, International Conference on Learning Representations
  5. 10.1126/science.aag2302 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.226401 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.031034 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.2122059119 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.054410 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/s42005-024-01678-7 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033429 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.023138 · DOI
  13. F. Becca, 2017, Quantum Monte Carlo Approaches for Correlated Systems, 10.1017/9781316417041 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/s42005-024-01732-4 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41467-024-45172-8 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s43588-023-00578-0 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s42005-024-01584-y · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.090501 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013216 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.236401 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023057 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.241103 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/s41567-024-02566-1 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2863 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.R9612 · DOI
  26. C. Lacroix, 2011, Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism: Materials, Experiments, Theory, 10.1007/978-3-642-10589-0 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.212402 · DOI
  28. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.5.166 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.11446 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.11678 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.060402 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.014417 · DOI
  33. 10.1088/0256-307X/39/7/077502 · DOI
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.027201 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/s41467-023-44216-9 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011040 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/nphys4037 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/s41467-024-45014-7 · DOI
  39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.100503 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.046501 · DOI
  41. R. Novak, 2022, Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning

Metadata

Authors
Rende, R., Goldt, S., Becca, F., & Viteritti, L. L.
Affiliations
  • Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT)
  • University of Trieste (IT)
Venue
Physical Review Research
Published
2024-12-16
Volume
6
Issue
4
ISSN
2643-1564 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405444162
Cited by
10
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • SDL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • CINECA
  • ISCRA
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Keywords
neural quantum states, fine-tuning, pre-training, phase transitions, quantum many-body systems, ground-state properties, strongly correlated systems, computational complexity reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review